Teams

RTC LOVE

2026 FW USTA Adult Fall - Men · 3.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-26vs CCC MUSGROVEWon 31
W#1 DoublesLal Kandathil / Tristan Degonia vs Andrew Scott / Christopher Musgrove7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLandon Love vs Riley Santen1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBryan Disney / Jackson Keefe vs Garrett Podell / Ryan Seaver6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWilliam Kincaid / Chris Zafiriou vs Cory Boggess / William Parkey6-0, 6-3
2025-10-11vs RTC LEWIS (silver alerts)Won 31
W#1 DoublesMatt Chehab / Adam Rizzo vs Mark Mayer / Randy Keller6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSean McPherson vs Vaughn Deary6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJackson Keefe / Tristan Degonia vs Michael Lewis / JACOB MICHAEL6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLal Kandathil / Chris Zafiriou vs Doug French / Safwan Hallab4-6, 3-6
2025-10-04vs RID BASS (Bulls)Split 22
L#1 DoublesLeo Moore / William Kincaid vs John Deibel / Kyle Lindquist6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCaleb Rea vs Jacob Dekeratry0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Love / Landon Love vs Brian Smith / Rod Ryer6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesOtis Kue / Sean McPherson vs Jack Delk / Jeff Yale6-0, 6-0
2025-09-27vs MCL MANONSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLal Kandathil / Adam Rizzo vs Daniel Barraza / Omar Alvarado7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBryan Disney vs Miguel Vega6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Love / Jackson Keefe vs Diego Esparza / Ryan Breaux6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMatt Chehab / Sean McPherson vs Brian Evans / Ian Mendoza6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-06vs CCC MUSGROVEWon 40
W#1 DoublesOtis Kue / Matt Chehab vs Christopher Musgrove / David North6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCaleb Rea vs Riley Santen7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLal Kandathil / Landon Love vs William Parkey / Alexander Owre6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Love / Brian Ownby vs Joshua Leonard / Garrett Podell6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Jackson Keefe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Brian Ownby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Matt Chehab
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Bryan Disney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Landon Love
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.45
William Kincaid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Lal Kandathil
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Adam Rizzo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Otis Kue
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Rick Meisel
published
3.37
Michael Love
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Leo Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Caleb Rea
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Sean McPherson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.16
Chris Zafiriou
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Tristan Degonia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Kincaid + Chris Zafiriou4260% gamesnot enough data
Michael Love + Rick Meisel224 matchesnot enough data
Matt Chehab + Landon Love404 matchesnot enough data
William Kincaid + Otis Kue303 matchesnot enough data
Michael Love + Matt Chehab213 matchesnot enough data
Sean McPherson + Matt Chehab033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jackson Keefe
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Brian Ownby
40W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
Matt Chehab
21W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Bryan Disney
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
3.48
Landon Love
31W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
William Kincaid
19W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
Lal Kandathil
9W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Adam Rizzo
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Otis Kue
20W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Rick Meisel
20W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.38
Michael Love
28W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Leo Moore
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Caleb Rea
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Sean McPherson
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Chris Zafiriou
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
Tristan Degonia
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.