Teams

CPV RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.71 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-22vs CACI BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesMorgan Mayoss / Bridget Moreno vs Samantha Downing / Carrie Bryan0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesPaula Hruska vs Soon Hee Kolrud7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Natalie Vickers vs May Dodds / Virginia Gamble6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErica Westphal / Tracey McCarthy vs Julie Anderies / Mary Ann Martin6-3, 6-0
2021-07-17vs PRKR NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Vickers / Gina Lurie vs Cheryl Jolley / Jennifer Benson3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesPaula Hruska vs Crystal Hostelley5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesErica Westphal / Bridget Moreno vs Rudi Fields / Heather McGinnis5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-07-15vs VCC TEALWon 31
W#1 DoublesDarcy Hendricks / Bridget Moreno vs Elizabeth Quinn / Tamie Walker6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKelly Shadwick vs Kari Schaefer1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesErica Westphal / Morgan Mayoss vs Karen Stoughton / Dawn Baranek5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Natalie Vickers vs Michele Pensa / Karen Blach6-2, 6-2
2021-07-08vs SSLT MAROONWon 31
W#1 DoublesErica Westphal / Darcy Hendricks vs CELESTE SIADE / Karen McIntire6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSandy Biley vs Ellen Thompson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTracey McCarthy / Natalie Vickers vs Andrea Bailey / Jennifer Cree6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGina Lurie / Holly Smith vs Kristi Mathieson / Carin Buster3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-06-24vs PRC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesSandy Biley / Darcy Hendricks vs Amber Jorgensen / Charlie Ghidotti2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Shadwick vs Maureen Butler2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGina Lurie / Tracey McCarthy vs Julie Eisenrich / Rebecca Kobayashi2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesErica Westphal / Tanya Hunter vs Amanda Caldwell / Liz Holt6-7, 4-6
2021-06-17vs PCRK BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesBridget Moreno / Morgan Mayoss vs Carol Brohl / Inessa McGill6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSandy Biley vs Jaime West6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNatalie Vickers / Holly Smith vs Tina Book / Betty Murray6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTracey McCarthy / Gina Lurie vs Randi Wickliff / Juli Reiakvam6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2021-06-10vs HRCA PINKLost 13
L#1 DoublesGina Lurie / Erica Westphal vs Sarah Plagenza / Amy Quinette3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPaula Hruska vs Leann Penland6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSandy Biley / Lisa Wiggins vs Elise Marks-Gruitch / Lara Callas1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTanya Hunter / Holly Smith vs Erin Maloney / Kimberly Bevill2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Darcy Hendricks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Kelly Shadwick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.54
Sandy Biley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
Natalie Vickers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Erica Westphal
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Bridget Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Gina Lurie
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Morgan Mayoss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Paula Hruska
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Tanya Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Westphal + Gina Lurie4643% games−7.2% vs expected
Erica Westphal + Morgan Mayoss213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darcy Hendricks
11W–1L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Kelly Shadwick
41W–44L career · 2 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
3.62
4
Sandy Biley
120W–109L career · 4 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Natalie Vickers
90W–48L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Erica Westphal
83W–77L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Bridget Moreno
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Gina Lurie
108W–107L career · 5 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
Morgan Mayoss
19W–19L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Paula Hruska
20W–24L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tanya Hunter
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.