Teams

PRKR NAVY

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-22vs PRC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesAllison Stewart / Angela D'Alessandro vs Ellen Irwin / Marcie Manuello0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCrystal Hostelley vs Maureen Butler1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCheryl Jolley / Georgina Swales vs Cathy Kerkhove / Rebecca Kobayashi4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVirginia Hinds / Heather McGinnis vs Charlie Ghidotti / Christie Dyer3-6, 3-6
2021-07-20vs VCC TEALLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela D'Alessandro / Crystal Hostelley vs Elizabeth Quinn / Kari Schaefer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGeorgina Swales / Rudi Fields vs Dana Ricketts / Dawn Baranek6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHeidi Kelly / Cheryl Jolley vs Karen Blach / Kathy Dosen3-6, 4-6
2021-07-17vs CPV REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCheryl Jolley / Jennifer Benson vs Natalie Vickers / Gina Lurie6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCrystal Hostelley vs Paula Hruska7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRudi Fields / Heather McGinnis vs Erica Westphal / Bridget Moreno7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGeorgina Swales / Heidi Kelly vs Tracey McCarthy / Holly Smith3-6, 3-6
2021-07-15vs HRCA PINKLost 12
W#1 DoublesGeorgina Swales / Jennifer Benson vs Amy Quinette / Danielle Butler6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRudi Fields / Cheryl Jolley vs Karol Stevens / Diana Guardian2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHeidi Kelly / Heather McGinnis vs Kimberly Bevill / Erin Maloney5-7, 2-6
2021-06-24vs PCRK BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesGeorgina Swales / Jennifer Benson vs Carol Brohl / Inessa McGill7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVirginia Hinds / Cheryl Jolley vs Tina Book / Jennifer Rider6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngela D'Alessandro / Heidi Kelly vs Juli Reiakvam / Randi Wickliff6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-17vs CACI BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAllison Stewart / Angela D'Alessandro vs Julie Anderies / Mary Ann Martin5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCrystal Hostelley vs Samantha Downing7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCheryl Jolley / Jennifer Benson vs Carrie Bryan / Virginia Gamble4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRudi Fields / Virginia Hinds vs May Dodds / Karen Daciek6-3, 6-4
2021-06-10vs SSLT MAROONWon 40
W#1 DoublesAllison Stewart / Angela D'Alessandro vs Kristi Mathieson / Carin Buster6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCrystal Hostelley vs Ellen Thompson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRudi Fields / Virginia Hinds vs Brenda Lillard / Jennifer Cree6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHeidi Kelly / Heather McGinnis vs CELESTE SIADE / Michelle Rubin6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PRKR NAVY5115922185
2SSH GOLD43121635257
3CACI BLACK24101431229
4BM GOLD25121637281
5MEA NAVY1571735244
6VCC NAVY0642041264

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Heidi Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Georgina Swales
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Cheryl Jolley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
Angela D'Alessandro
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Jennifer Benson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Heather McGinnis
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Crystal Hostelley
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Rudi Fields
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Virginia Hinds
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rudi Fields + Virginia Hinds5260% games+5.8% vs expected
Georgina Swales + Jennifer Benson421359% games+2.2% vs expected
Georgina Swales + Heidi Kelly134 matchesnot enough data
Crystal Hostelley + Angela D'Alessandro224 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Kelly + Angela D'Alessandro303 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Kelly + Virginia Hinds123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heidi Kelly
56W–52L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Georgina Swales
93W–37L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cheryl Jolley
16W–14L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Angela D'Alessandro
99W–60L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Jennifer Benson
59W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Heather McGinnis
80W–85L career · 4 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Crystal Hostelley
37W–33L career · 5 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
Rudi Fields
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Virginia Hinds
17W–17L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.