Teams

MLM:Summer Match Points:Lincer/Sheffield

2026 NCT Summer Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Adult Women Summer

24 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-06vs (Q) BTC:Ace of Baseline:CushmanLost 13
L#1 DoublesNancy Carrozza / Colleen McDonough vs Anna Huttner / Brenna McAllister0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNatong Lin vs Caitlin Richard2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Bowe / Cheyenne Brindle vs Jeanne Larsen / Dawn O'Shaughnessy6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMelanie Remillard / Melinda Smith vs Sharon Farber / Christine Meo5-7, 3-6
2026-06-29vs GTC:Mid-Court Crisis:Bray/MoodyWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaryn Blaise / Jessica Paquette vs Mary Ellen Mooney / Mary Varley6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLiana Eller vs Anna Seymour0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Mabe / XIA TANG vs Nancy Bray / Pamela Moody6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesIsabela Piza Danielsen / Ashley Vargas vs Mary Daley / Lindsay Butler6-1, 6-2
2026-06-24vs MRC:Locked In:BandakLost 04
L#1 DoublesXia Lu / Melissa Mabe vs Leigh Libero / Jennifer Avari4-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJill Kehl vs Supreeti Saikia2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Pascal / JoAnne Ramm vs Mina Kim / Juliana Foster1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGail Sheffield / Melanie Remillard vs Ali Cordova / Nancy Hawley1-6, 1-6
2026-06-15vs (Q) BTC:Ace of Baseline:CushmanLost 13
W#1 DoublesJessica Paquette / Amy Pascal vs Julie Piller / Linda Wright6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesNancy Carrozza vs Caitlin Richard2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaggie Piccirillo / Melanie Remillard vs Genna Griffith / Kelly-Anne Moffa1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKim Consoli / Ashley Vargas vs Catherine Godin / Nora Cosgrove3-6, 2-6
2026-06-08vs (Q) BSF:Ad Court:AbreuSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKaryn Blaise / Xia Lu vs Kristine Blaha / Debbie Horovitz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAriana Korcz vs Joy Fausey4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Bowe / Cheyenne Brindle vs Louisa Hogan / Nancy Langlais7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesIsabela Piza Danielsen / Jill Kehl vs Sara Loughman / JoAnne Mahonski6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-28vs GTC:Mid-Court Crisis:Bray/MoodyLost 13
W#1 DoublesNatong Lin / XIA TANG vs Denise Slaughter / Judith Sutton6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMaggie Piccirillo vs Anna Seymour0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesColleen McDonough / Liana Eller vs Pamela Moody / Janice Parla6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelinda Smith / JoAnne Ramm vs Margaret Kehoe / Britt Miglietta4-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5 Adult Women Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MRC:Locked In:Bandak061939152
2FV:Summer Chaos Queens:Yaffee/Nassar0614921192
3(Q) BSF:Ad Court:Abreu06131025211
4(Q) PRC:Summer Spinners:Quaintance/Green06131026203
5BSF:Deuce Court:Neville06101226217
6(Q) BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman06111227214
7RFL:Summer Slayers:Walsh/Vaughn06131129232
8ETC:Summer Circus:Philbin/Roncalli06101431237
9BSF:40 - Love:Drees/Murray0691331237
10MLM:Summer Match Points:Lincer/Sheffield0681432233
11GTC:Mid-Court Crisis:Bray/Moody0651736249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Karyn Blaise
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Natong Lin
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Colleen McDonough
published 3.5
3.23
Jessica Paquette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Xia Lu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Rachel Bowe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Isabela Piza Danielsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.12
Melissa Mabe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Susan Salinas
published
3.10
Ariana Korcz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Cheyenne Brindle
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.03
Liana Eller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.02
Amy Pascal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Jill Kehl
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Gail Sheffield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Ashley Vargas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
XIA TANG
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.85
Melinda Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Nancy Carrozza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.80
Maggie Piccirillo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Melanie Remillard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
JoAnne Ramm
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Kim Consoli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Karina Lincer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Mabe + Xia Lu7260% games+9.8% vs expected
JoAnne Ramm + Xia Lu6163% games+9.7% vs expected
Melissa Mabe + Melinda Smith12361% games+8.5% vs expected
Melanie Remillard + Melinda Smith3447% games+5.7% vs expected
Kim Consoli + Melissa Mabe2449% games+0.7% vs expected
JoAnne Ramm + Melinda Smith9951% games−0.3% vs expected
JoAnne Ramm + Melissa Mabe101049% games−1.5% vs expected
Kim Consoli + JoAnne Ramm3939% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karyn Blaise
66W–90L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Natong Lin
47W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Colleen McDonough
5W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Paquette
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Xia Lu
101W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Rachel Bowe
62W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.15
3
Isabela Piza Danielsen
46W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.14
Melissa Mabe
112W–83L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.12
Susan Salinas
71W–48L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Ariana Korcz
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Cheyenne Brindle
106W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.04
Liana Eller
23W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Amy Pascal
57W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Jill Kehl
70W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3.5
Gail Sheffield
13W–59L career · 1 line in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Ashley Vargas
34W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
XIA TANG
67W–58L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
Melinda Smith
86W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
Nancy Carrozza
22W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.84
Maggie Piccirillo
47W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Melanie Remillard
39W–57L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
JoAnne Ramm
93W–104L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Kim Consoli
30W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
Karina Lincer
7W–30L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.