Teams

BSF:40 - Love:Drees/Murray

2026 NCT Summer Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Adult Women Summer

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-07vs BSF:Deuce Court:NevilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesRachel Buchanan / Meagan Lyons vs Suzanne Neville / Elizabeth Heinze6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLesia Comperatore vs Judy Schuler6-4, 2-5
W#2 DoublesChristina Thavenius / Audrey Boskiewicz vs Danielle Coccomo / Tenley Phillips6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarcy Drees / Kristin Pollack vs Debbie White / Kristin Herzog3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesRachel Buchanan / Samantha Doering vs Carol MacColl / Sabine Schneider7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichele Wolff / Audrey Boskiewicz vs Valerie Stauber / Kate Fawthrop6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacie Espeso / Kristin Pollack vs Lucy Hartry / Laurie Philbin5-7, 6-7
L#1 DoublesChristina Thavenius / Michele Wolff vs Nay Nassar / Allison Yaffee6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAudrey Boskiewicz vs Heather Goetz6-7, 2-4
W#2 DoublesMeagan Lyons / Marcy Drees vs Anna Namnoum / Taylor Radke7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaurie Swanson / Amy Raisner vs Saren Cassotto / Haley Kennedy2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesRachel Buchanan / Stacie Espeso vs Christine Burns / Lauren Sansing7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLesia Comperatore vs Sandra Davis0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMeagan Lyons / Christina Thavenius vs Becky Klimkosky / Valeria Castelli - Asano5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAmy Raisner / Courtney Feingold vs Joyce Keisman / Susan Fearey6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-02vs RFL:Summer Slayers:Walsh/VaughnSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichele Wolff / Meagan Lyons vs Maureen Vaughn / Judith Mason1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCheryl Murray vs Lisa Levine6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Buchanan / Laurie Swanson vs Julie Walsh / Monica Katzen2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCourtney Feingold / Christina Thavenius vs Christine Peterson / Kristina Schumann6-4, 6-3
2026-05-26vs BSF:Deuce Court:NevilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesStacie Espeso / Samantha Doering vs Elizabeth Heinze / Suzanne Neville6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAudrey Boskiewicz vs Judy Schuler5-7, 1-2
L#2 DoublesMeagan Lyons / Cheryl Murray vs Karla Turekian / Danielle Coccomo2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Swanson / Kristin Pollack vs Shelley Dodd / Kristin Herzog7-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5 Adult Women Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MRC:Locked In:Bandak061939152
2FV:Summer Chaos Queens:Yaffee/Nassar0614921192
3(Q) BSF:Ad Court:Abreu06131025211
4(Q) PRC:Summer Spinners:Quaintance/Green06131026203
5BSF:Deuce Court:Neville06101226217
6(Q) BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman06111227214
7RFL:Summer Slayers:Walsh/Vaughn06131129232
8ETC:Summer Circus:Philbin/Roncalli06101431237
9BSF:40 - Love:Drees/Murray0691331237
10MLM:Summer Match Points:Lincer/Sheffield0681432233
11GTC:Mid-Court Crisis:Bray/Moody0651736249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Christina Thavenius
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Samantha Doering
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Rachel Buchanan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Meagan Lyons
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.18
Lesia Comperatore
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.16
Karen Holden
published
3.16
Michele Wolff
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.13
Cheryl Murray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
3.09
Courtney Feingold
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.07
Stacie Espeso
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Marcy Drees
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Corey Zeilman
published 3.5
2.85
Audrey Boskiewicz
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.82
Amy Raisner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Kristin Pollack
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Laurie Swanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meagan Lyons + Christina Thavenius9463% games+14.4% vs expected
Marcy Drees + Corey Zeilman6171% games+12.7% vs expected
Courtney Feingold + Amy Raisner6064% games+11.1% vs expected
Amy Raisner + Christina Thavenius9166% games+10.4% vs expected
Amy Raisner + Rachel Buchanan5158% games+8.9% vs expected
Amy Raisner + Cheryl Murray15460% games+8.2% vs expected
Cheryl Murray + Marcy Drees7265% games+6.4% vs expected
Amy Raisner + Marcy Drees4255% games+5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Thavenius
45W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Samantha Doering
31W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Rachel Buchanan
88W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Meagan Lyons
63W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.21
Lesia Comperatore
59W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Karen Holden
12W–3L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Michele Wolff
52W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Cheryl Murray
62W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.13
3
Courtney Feingold
46W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Stacie Espeso
57W–62L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Marcy Drees
51W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Corey Zeilman
61W–11L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Audrey Boskiewicz
37W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Amy Raisner
65W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Kristin Pollack
15W–30L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
Laurie Swanson
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.