Teams

Boone Park - Cloutier

2025 Duval Trilevel 18 & Over Women - Winter · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-01vs FYC - KaneWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Beyer / Ruth Jones-Looney vs Amy Buckley / Jennelle Comiskey6-2, 7-5
2025-04-21vs ABCC - HallWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Beyer / Ruth Jones-Looney vs Eileen Edsall / Lisa Goodrich6-0, 6-2
2025-04-17vs FYC - KaneWon 10
W#1 DoublesRuth Jones-Looney / Natalie Beyer vs Jennelle Comiskey / Ashley Brockman6-2, 6-0
2025-03-13vs FYC - KaneWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Beyer / Allison Cloutier vs Amy Buckley / Ashley Brockman6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Angel / Susan Asher vs Beth Kane / Mary Kathleen Muldoon6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLori Mercer / Mary Holley vs Renee' Kirkland / Ashley Helmick5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-30vs ABCC - HallLost 12
W#1 DoublesMani Prieto / Michelle Reid vs Molly Mitchell Danciger / Ali Hall7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnnabelle Matias / Jennifer Angel vs Vicky Lane / Amy Burdette5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Holley / Lori Mercer vs Heather Weidle / Aline King6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Ruth Jones-Looney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
3.75
Michelle Reid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Natalie Beyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Allison Cloutier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Tori Todd
published
3.63
Susan Asher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Mani Prieto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Mary Holley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Annabelle Matias
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Lori Mercer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Angel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mani Prieto + Susan Asher4256% games+2.6% vs expected
Ruth Jones-Looney + Natalie Beyer4159% gamesnot enough data
Lori Mercer + Mary Holley314 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Reid + Mani Prieto213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ruth Jones-Looney
93W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Amanda Swearingen
103W–71L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Michelle Reid
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Natalie Beyer
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Allison Cloutier
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Tori Todd
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.71
Susan Asher
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.63
Mani Prieto
23W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
Mary Holley
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Annabelle Matias
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Lori Mercer
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Jennifer Angel
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.