Teams

ABCC - Hall

2025 Duval Trilevel 18 & Over Women - Winter · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.43 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-20vs Williams Y - MurrayWon 21
L#1 DoublesEileen Edsall / Lisa Goodrich vs Jill Jabot / Krista Murray4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVicky Lane / Victoria Miller vs Staci Hill / Kelli Bushman2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKari Merriman / Maria Quiros vs Angela Atkins / Irene Wolfe6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-13vs Williams Y - MurrayLost 02
L#1 DoublesEileen Edsall / Molly Mitchell Danciger vs Jill Jabot / Krista Murray5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Jenkins / Heather Weidle vs Christina Rigby / Staci Hill5-7, 2-6
2025-02-20vs Boone Park - CloutierLost 01
L#2 DoublesClaudia Adams / Vicky Lane vs Allison Cloutier / Tori Todd3-6, 1-6
2025-02-06vs FYC - KaneLost 01
L#2 DoublesClaudia Adams / Victoria Miller vs Tammy Morreale / Katie Culp4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-01-30vs Boone Park - CloutierWon 21
L#1 DoublesMolly Mitchell Danciger / Ali Hall vs Mani Prieto / Michelle Reid5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVicky Lane / Amy Burdette vs Annabelle Matias / Jennifer Angel7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeather Weidle / Aline King vs Mary Holley / Lori Mercer7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Ali Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eileen Edsall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Angie Talbott
published 3.5
3.48
Lisa Goodrich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Kari Merriman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Claudia Adams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Mary Jenkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Vicky Lane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Ana Carter
published 3
2.96
Maria Quiros
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Heather Weidle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Aline King
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Molly Mitchell Danciger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicky Lane + Angie Talbott033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ali Hall
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Eileen Edsall
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Angie Talbott
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Lisa Goodrich
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Kari Merriman
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
3.5
Claudia Adams
19W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Jenkins
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.25
Vicky Lane
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Ana Carter
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Maria Quiros
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Heather Weidle
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Aline King
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Molly Mitchell Danciger
6W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.