Teams

SDNC 7.0 Morgan Run/ Lemon

2022 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter- SDNC · SDNC - 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-19vs SDNC 7.0 Morgan Run/ FiliciaLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Lemon / Christopher Reid vs Rebekah Seidel / Jay Schram1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMaeve Brick / John Brick vs Christine Tangarie / Tom Vu0-6, 0-6
2022-03-05vs SDNC 7.0 Rancho Santa Fe/ BastiasWon 10
W#3 DoublesMaeve Brick / John Brick vs Jeff Kelleher / Holly Carter6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStanford Yee / Karen Yee vs Diana Clark / Emmanuel de Seroux2-6, 3-6
2022-02-05vs SDNC 7.0 Rancho Santa Fe/ BastiasSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Lemon / Jamie Lemon vs Derek Clotfelter / Marisel Bastias6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaeve Brick / John Brick vs LJ Nicholas / Blair Nicholas0-6, 4-6
2022-01-29vs SDNC 7.0 RPTC/ TaillacLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Lemon / Christopher Reid vs Tomoko Hoffman / Mike Sartwell2-6, 4-6
2022-01-22vs SDNC 7.0 Fairbanks Ranch CC/ PicunkoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKaren Yee / Stanford Yee vs Molly Santistevan / David Santistevan2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Lemon / Jamie Lemon vs Leanne Kiviharju / Robert Picunko1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Stanford Yee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Junli Feng
published 3.5
3.28
Maeve Brick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Bruce Danielson
published 3.5
3.20
Michelle Atkinson
published
3.20
Heather Lemon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.52
Barbara Haynor
published 3
2.50
Karen Yee
published
John Brick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Atkinson + Bruce Danielson11259% games+15.5% vs expected
Mirianas Chachisvilis + Maeve Brick4261% gamesnot enough data
John Brick + Maeve Brick224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stanford Yee
52W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Junli Feng
90W–63L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Maeve Brick
124W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Bruce Danielson
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Michelle Atkinson
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Heather Lemon
130W–102L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%6%94%
3.20
3
Barbara Haynor
3W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
2.52
Karen Yee
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
John Brick
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mirianas Chachisvilis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.