Teams

NNM 8.0 ELG - Miller

2023 USTA Mixed 55 & Over League - NNM · 8.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-16vs NNM 8.0 JC - KunzlerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Domenici / Tim Terell vs Karen Rice / Stephen Madeyski2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Martin / Anne Lyons vs Monica Davis / Hyeung-Sik Jason Min1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-06-12vs NNM 8.0 LOBO - HwangWon 30
W#1 DoublesRoger Prucino / Jennifer Lind vs Bryan Oliver / Juliana Lowe6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPauline Ziegen / Tim Terell vs Robert Hwang / Kathleen Barrett6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPeter Martin / Anne Lyons vs Janet Dosher / Steve Gutierrez6-4, 6-4
2023-06-07vs NNM 8.0 JC - BriggsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKaren Domenici / Tim Terell vs Susan Beavis / Monte Woods6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaurie Byrne / David Byrne vs Rae Woods / David Harnick1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-04vs NNM/Rising/Mixed 55 & Over/8.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesCraig Patterson / Kathy Bella vs Elaine Rising / Leon Redman2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Lyons / Peter Martin vs Lisa Nelson / Daniel McClanahan7-6, 7-6
2023-06-04vs NNM 8.0 JC - BriggsLost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Lind / Roger Prucino vs David Harnick / Melissa Bash0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Martin / Anne Lyons vs Susanne Korsan / Mitchell Levick3-6, 6-7
2023-05-25vs NNM 8.0 JC - KunzlerLost 03
L#1 DoublesHerve Goujon / Paula Schwartz vs Donn Calder / Rhonda Letz0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Lind / Roger Prucino vs Dianne Crowley / Jae Lee2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Martin / Anne Lyons vs Karen Rice / John Wills5-7, 1-6
2023-05-17vs NNM 8.0 LOBO - HwangSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPeter Martin / Anne Lyons vs Teresa Chavez / Jerome Romero2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRoger Prucino / Jennifer Lind vs Alan Zampini / Jane Tabet6-2, 6-3
2023-05-08vs NNM/Rising/Mixed 55 & Over/8.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesPauline Ziegen / Tim Terell vs Mark Friedman / Elaine Rising1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRoger Prucino / Jennifer Lind vs Daniel McClanahan / Laurie Frappier3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Rising/Mixed 55 & Over/8.07116823203
2NNM 8.0 JC - Kunzler53141022183
3NNM 8.0 JC - Briggs44131125224
4NNM 8.0 ELG - Miller35111331246
5NNM 8.0 LOBO - Hwang1761839262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Laurie Byrne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Roger Prucino
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Herve Goujon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Peter Martin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
3.68
Tim Terell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Karen Domenici
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Jennifer Lind
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.30
Kathy Bella
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Craig Patterson
published 3.5
3.05
David Byrne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Anne Lyons
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Dennis Marker
published
Paula Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Pauline Ziegen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roger Prucino + Jennifer Lind182147% games−5.4% vs expected
Anne Lyons + Peter Martin111247% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Byrne + David Byrne033 matchesnot enough data
Karen Domenici + Tim Terell123 matchesnot enough data
Tim Terell + Pauline Ziegen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Byrne
40W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
4.13
Roger Prucino
79W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Herve Goujon
5W–13L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Peter Martin
111W–93L career · 8 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Tim Terell
21W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
Karen Domenici
36W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jennifer Lind
42W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
Kathy Bella
42W–29L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Craig Patterson
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
David Byrne
3W–17L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Anne Lyons
11W–12L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Dennis Marker
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula Schwartz
81W–65L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Pauline Ziegen
78W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.