Teams

MCP.Hariharan

2025 CTRL Fall Singles 40 & Over · Fall Singles 40 & Over 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-24vs TOC.FrankWon 20
W#1 SinglesVamsee Pasangulapati vs Dat Pham6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesSathisha Kumar vs Jason Frank6-2, 6-3
2025-11-23vs TOC.KalluruLost 02
L#2 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Kiran Ramaswamy2-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs Seshagiri Kalluru5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-23vs TOC.KnoxWon 10
W#2 SinglesSathisha Kumar vs Mark Heron6-1, 6-3
2025-11-19vs TOC.KalluruLost 01
L#2 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Rajshekar Chandraprakash4-6, 0-6
2025-11-03vs TOC.FrankWon 20
W#2 SinglesVamsee Pasangulapati vs Blair Haithcock4-5
W#3 SinglesSathisha Kumar vs Douglas Pletcher6-3, 6-4
2025-10-26vs TOC.KnoxSplit 11
L#2 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs Hai Le2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Daniel Knox7-5, 6-2
2025-10-21vs TOC.KnoxLost 01
L#2 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Pedro Loaiza1-6, 3-6
2025-10-13vs TOC.FrankLost 02
L#1 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Jose Porrua2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Douglas Pletcher3-6, 0-6
2025-10-10vs TOC.KalluruWon 20
W#2 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSathisha Kumar vs Seshagiri Kalluru6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Mohit Bhatnagar
published
3.87
Sathisha Kumar
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.83
Vamsee Pasangulapati
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.61
Neeraj Singh
published
3.60
Karan Mehra
published
3.52
Pradeep Hariharan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.40
Nitni Agrawal
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Amit Sachan
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amit Sachan + Nitni Agrawal4250% games−3.1% vs expected
Vamsee Pasangulapati + Sathisha Kumar3251% gamesnot enough data
Pradeep Hariharan + Nitni Agrawal314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mohit Bhatnagar
19W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Sathisha Kumar
143W–107L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Vamsee Pasangulapati
136W–76L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
Neeraj Singh
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.61
Karan Mehra
18W–35L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Pradeep Hariharan
197W–109L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Nitni Agrawal
211W–123L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Amit Sachan
256W–241L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.