Teams

TOC.Kalluru

2025 CTRL Fall Singles 40 & Over · Fall Singles 40 & Over 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-04vs TOC.FrankLost 01
L#1 SinglesClaude Ruffieux vs Atul Mehendale0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-11-24vs TOC.KnoxWon 30
W#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs David Rowe6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBrian Dorais vs Thomas Zietlow6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesClaude Ruffieux vs Hai Le6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-11-23vs MCP.HariharanSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBrian Dorais vs Karan Mehra5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Amit Sachan6-2, 7-6
2025-11-19vs MCP.HariharanWon 10
W#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Karan Mehra6-3, 6-2
2025-11-03vs TOC.KnoxSplit 11
L#1 SinglesNick Zelano vs David Rowe3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesClaude Ruffieux vs Pedro Loaiza7-6, 6-0
2025-10-20vs TOC.FrankWon 21
L#1 SinglesBrian Dorais vs Blair Haithcock5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesNick Zelano vs Jason Frank6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesClaude Ruffieux vs Douglas Pletcher7-6, 7-5
2025-10-13vs TOC.KnoxLost 02
L#1 SinglesNick Zelano vs David Rowe3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesBrian Dorais vs Hai Le3-6, 1-6
2025-10-10vs MCP.HariharanLost 01
L#1 SinglesBrian Dorais vs Mohit Bhatnagar1-6, 2-6
2025-10-03vs TOC.FrankLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrian Dorais vs Blair Haithcock2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesNick Zelano vs Jose Porrua1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Claude Ruffieux
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.65
Kiran Ramaswamy
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.62
Rajshekar Chandraprakash
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.61
Nick Zelano
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.54
Brian Dorais
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Seshagiri Kalluru
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Claude Ruffieux
125W–153L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Kiran Ramaswamy
178W–129L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Rajshekar Chandraprakash
77W–48L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
4
Nick Zelano
55W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Brian Dorais
137W–142L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.54
Seshagiri Kalluru
28W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.