Teams

Ellis/40/7.5/CM/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 7.5 Shrev

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 10 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 17 6:00 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 24 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Oct 1 6:00 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
2026-09-03vs Furqueron/40/7.5/CM/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Lowe / David Courtney vs Richard Karam / Jamie Pipes1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Bouillon / Stephen Craig vs Slattery Johnson / Brian Furqueron1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTodd Eppler / Daniel Brignac vs Jason Castro / Buddy Allen6-1, 6-2
2026-08-27vs Furqueron/40/7.5/CM/BTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Barr / Cody Lenert vs Jason Castro / Jamie Pipes6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Courtney / David Lowe vs Joel Orr / Jesse Waller2-6, 4-6
2026-08-13vs Furqueron/40/7.5/CM/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesTodd Eppler / Jason Revere vs Mike Fiser / Slattery Johnson0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Courtney / John Barr vs Eric Basinger / Richard Karam6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTimothy Ellis / Daniel Brignac vs Jamie Pipes / Harry Johnson4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Furqueron/40/7.5/CM/BTC1030015
2Ellis/40/7.5/CM/BTC0103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Edward Burchett
published
3.60
John Barr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Todd Eppler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Timothy Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Daniel Brignac
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
David Courtney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Cody Lenert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Brian Bouillon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Sean Deere
published
Jason Revere
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Edward Burchett
11W–11L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
John Barr
12W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Todd Eppler
38W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Timothy Ellis
25W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Daniel Brignac
22W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.44
3.5
David Courtney
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Cody Lenert
24W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.16
3
Brian Bouillon
29W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Sean Deere
9W–22L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.96
Jason Revere
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.