Teams

Wetzler-Behar Tri Level

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Tri-Level · 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-04Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAlecia Barnes / Sara Velarde vs Christine Hughes / Tori Sutler2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTamara Faulkner / Julia Woodson vs Julie Clark / April Bazin4-6, 2-6
2022-08-04vs KPatreyLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaphne Poulk / Sara Velarde vs Terry Perrone / Laura Ross3-2
2022-08-03vs CBeairdWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlecia Barnes / Daphne Poulk vs Jennifer Markham / Tiffany Barrier7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTamara Faulkner / Meaghan Christopher vs Caroline Beaird / Manjula Nagaraja6-3, 6-4
2022-07-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesBobbie West / Daphne Poulk vs Christine Burr / Shannon McNeill6-1, 6-2
2022-07-14vs ISShepherdWon 10
W#2 DoublesCaroline Walters / Tamara Faulkner vs Melanie Hewitt / Aimee Mikula6-2, 6-3
2022-06-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlecia Barnes / Daphne Poulk vs Kelly Townsend / Laura Ross4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-06-23vs DLangeLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlecia Barnes / Sara Velarde vs Allison DeMacy / Christine Hughes0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMeaghan Christopher / Tamara Faulkner vs Julie Clark / April Bazin2-6, 3-6
2022-06-21vs CBeairdWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlecia Barnes / Daphne Poulk vs Tiffany Barrier / Inma Navarro Galisteo6-4, 6-2
2022-06-02vs KPatreyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBobbie West / Daphne Poulk vs Shannon McNeill / Lisa Kempf7-6, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Daphne Poulk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Sara Velarde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Bobbie West
published 3.5
3.00
Tamara Faulkner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Caroline Walters
published 3
2.59
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Velarde + Daphne Poulk224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daphne Poulk
91W–58L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Sara Velarde
134W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Bobbie West
0W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Tamara Faulkner
59W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Caroline Walters
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Ellen Wetzler-Behar
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.