Teams

DLange

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Tri-Level · 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.39 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-04vs CBeairdWon 10
W#1 DoublesAllison DeMacy / Tori Sutler vs Julie Rizzo / Tiffany Barrier6-2, 6-0
2022-07-21vs ISShepherdSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAllison DeMacy / Tori Sutler vs Carrie Struble / Tina Dahir6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBethany Stempien / Melissa Proctor vs Michele Lagerstedt / Sara Mazurak3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-07-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesTori Sutler / Allison DeMacy vs Shannon McNeill / AnneSophie Dorey6-1, 6-3
2022-06-23vs Wetzler-Behar Tri LevelWon 10
W#1 DoublesAllison DeMacy / Christine Hughes vs Alecia Barnes / Sara Velarde6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-09vs BLeippeWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristen Levine / Bethany Stempien vs Miriam Waters / Sarah Copley6-2, 6-2
2022-06-09vs ISShepherdWon 10
W#3 DoublesBethany Stempien / Kristen Levine vs Lauren Lelewski / Michele Lagerstedt5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Tori Sutler
usually #1 Doubles 92%, also #3 Doubles 8% · published 4
3.73
Christine Hughes
published 4
3.73
Allison DeMacy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
April Bazin
usually #2 Doubles 91%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published 3.5
3.46
Kristen Levine
published
3.25
Jennifer Kaulback
published 3.5
2.69
Emily Goatcher
published 3
2.67
Denise Lange
published 3
2.65
April Lyon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.24
Bethany Stempien
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

April Lyon + April Bazin4651% games+4.6% vs expected
Allison DeMacy + Tori Sutler13459% games+3.7% vs expected
Allison DeMacy + April Bazin5167% gamesnot enough data
Christine Hughes + April Bazin224 matchesnot enough data
April Bazin + Tori Sutler314 matchesnot enough data
Christine Hughes + Allison DeMacy213 matchesnot enough data
April Bazin + Kristen Levine303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tori Sutler
193W–55L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Christine Hughes
23W–29L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Allison DeMacy
272W–119L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
April Bazin
188W–118L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kristen Levine
29W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Jennifer Kaulback
125W–76L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Emily Goatcher
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Denise Lange
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
3
April Lyon
118W–140L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
2.5
Bethany Stempien
78W–106L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.