Teams

BLeippe

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Tri-Level · 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-04vs ISShepherdLost 01
L#3 DoublesMiriam Waters / Mary Elizabeth Miller vs Fran Harris / Sara Mazurak3-6, 3-6
2022-07-28vs CBeairdSplit 11
W#2 DoublesHeather Roberts / Wendy Sielaty vs Elie Foy / Nina Schweitzer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Elizabeth Miller / Miriam Waters vs Leigh Stallings / Manjula Nagaraja2-6, 0-6
2022-07-25Won 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Bakowski / Marie Gelston vs Julia Woodson / Caroline Walters6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMiriam Waters / Mary Elizabeth Miller vs Christina Sendall / Tracy Stillwell4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-07-14vs DLangeLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Elizabeth Miller / Miriam Waters vs Jennifer Kaulback / Melissa Proctor3-6, 4-6
2022-06-30vs ISShepherdWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Bakowski / Christine Burr vs Diane Sugarman / Tina Dahir6-4, 7-5
2022-06-23vs CBeairdWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Bakowski / Wendy Sielaty vs Manjula Nagaraja / Jill Cramer6-1, 6-2
2022-06-09vs DLangeLost 01
L#3 DoublesMiriam Waters / Sarah Copley vs Kristen Levine / Bethany Stempien2-6, 2-6
2022-06-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Bakowski / Marie Gelston vs Meaghan Christopher / Caroline Walters6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Lisa Kempf
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.10
Christine Burr
published 3
2.97
Lisa Bakowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Marie Gelston
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.78
Wendy Sielaty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Sarah Copley
published
2.53
Miriam Waters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Sielaty + Marie Gelston272450% games+0.9% vs expected
Lisa Bakowski + Marie Gelston303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa Kempf
367W–302L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3
Christine Burr
28W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Lisa Bakowski
156W–95L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Marie Gelston
215W–161L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Wendy Sielaty
168W–185L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
Sarah Copley
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Miriam Waters
70W–94L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%42%58%
2.53
Mary Elizabeth Miller
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.