Teams

Idaho/Iseri/65&Over7.0M

2022 65 and OVER - BOISE · TV

10 players · average NTRP 3.43 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-08vs Have FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesDOUGLAS de BURGH / Christopher Lind vs Tracy Kowallis / Ralph Butler6-2, 6-2
2022-09-06vs The Adams FamilySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarc Iseri / David Northness vs Jerry Adams / Daniel Reed1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDOUGLAS de BURGH / Christopher Lind vs Jim Geddings / Frank Ternullo6-1, 6-3
2022-08-30vs Have FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesDOUGLAS de BURGH / Christopher Lind vs Christopher Dirstine / Tracy Kowallis6-0, 6-3
2022-08-25vs The Adams FamilyWon 10
W#2 DoublesDOUGLAS de BURGH / Christopher Lind vs Daniel Reed / Robert Speers6-3, 6-2
2022-08-16vs The Adams FamilyLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Buchanan / Marc Iseri vs Daniel Reed / Francisco Limbago0-6, 2-6
2022-08-09vs Have FunLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Northness / Peter Visalli vs Milorad Papic / Tony Totorica2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-08-04vs The Adams FamilyLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Northness / Lynn Coltrin vs Robert Speers / Brossy Reina4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Iseri/65&Over7.0M6218614167
2Have Fun44101434246
3The Adams Family2681633220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
David Umberger
published 3.5
3.33
James Elliott
published 3.5
Christopher Lind
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Lynn Coltrin
published 3.5
3.14
DOUGLAS de BURGH
published 3.5
3.00
Steven Buchanan
published 3.5
David Northness
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jonathan Bloomer
published
Marc Iseri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Visalli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Buchanan + David Umberger13753% games−2.6% vs expected
Lynn Coltrin + Steven Buchanan3449% games−3.9% vs expected
James Elliott + DOUGLAS de BURGH5648% games−11.3% vs expected
Lynn Coltrin + James Elliott71345% games−13.9% vs expected
DOUGLAS de BURGH + Christopher Lind501860% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Coltrin + Christopher Lind61843% gamesnot enough data
James Elliott + Peter Visalli12658% gamesnot enough data
David Northness + DOUGLAS de BURGH8655% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Umberger
85W–58L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.46
3.5
James Elliott
95W–94L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Christopher Lind
50W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Lynn Coltrin
87W–108L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
DOUGLAS de BURGH
72W–46L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Steven Buchanan
80W–110L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
David Northness
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jonathan Bloomer
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marc Iseri
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Visalli
12W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.