Teams

The Adams Family

2022 65 and OVER - BOISE · TV

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-06vs Idaho/Iseri/65&Over7.0MWon 10
W#1 DoublesJerry Adams / Daniel Reed vs Marc Iseri / David Northness6-1, 6-4
2022-09-01vs Have FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesJerry Adams / Daniel Reed vs Christopher Dirstine / Tracy Kowallis6-1, 6-1
2022-08-25Lost 02
L#1 DoublesFrancisco Limbago / Jim Geddings vs Steven Buchanan / David Umberger3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDaniel Reed / Robert Speers vs DOUGLAS de BURGH / Christopher Lind3-6, 2-6
2022-08-23vs Have FunSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDaniel Reed / Francisco Limbago vs Christopher Dirstine / Tracy Kowallis6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJim Geddings / Todd Miller vs Ralph Butler / Milorad Papic3-6, 3-6
2022-08-16vs Idaho/Iseri/65&Over7.0MWon 20
W#1 DoublesDaniel Reed / Francisco Limbago vs Steven Buchanan / Marc Iseri6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTodd Miller / Terry Hayden vs James Elliott / Lynn Coltrin6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-11vs Have FunLost 02
L#1 DoublesFrancisco Limbago / Terry Hayden vs Tracy Kowallis / Christopher Dirstine6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTodd Miller / Frank Ternullo vs James Cook / Curt Barbee3-6, 1-6
2022-08-04vs Idaho/Iseri/65&Over7.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesFrancisco Limbago / Jim Geddings vs Steven Buchanan / David Umberger6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDarrell Ludders / Todd Miller vs Jonathan Bloomer / James Elliott1-6, 2-6
2022-08-02vs Have FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesFrancisco Limbago / Terry Hayden vs Christopher Dirstine / Tracy Kowallis6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Iseri/65&Over7.0M6218614167
2Have Fun44101434246
3The Adams Family2681633220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Daniel Reed
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Jerry Adams
published 3.5
3.24
Jim Geddings
published 3.5
3.18
Francisco Limbago
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Darrell Ludders
published 3.5
Robert Speers
published
Terry Hayden
published
Todd Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Francisco Limbago + Jim Geddings044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Reed
22W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Jerry Adams
18W–25L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jim Geddings
19W–27L career · type S · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Francisco Limbago
30W–36L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Darrell Ludders
7W–25L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Robert Speers
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Terry Hayden
3W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Miller
2W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.