Teams

CM BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs CACM BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesChristopher Hailes / Frankie Newman vs Justin Jelinek / Michael Vieau6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesClint Cook vs Derek McAnnar6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTaylor Weir / Michael Donovan vs Jay Logan / David Duganne6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichael Pardun / Jason Rutkofsky vs Jay Rael / Kyle Evashevski6-4, 6-3
2026-07-07vs WP GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesTaylor Weir / Frankie Newman vs Scott Ziemke / Chris Merman6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesClint Cook vs Gregg Found5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Donovan / Glenn Rippey vs Peter Sheldon / Mark Helman6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRussell Sedmak / Jason Rutkofsky vs Nathan Fuzi / Wade Westphal6-2, 6-1
2026-06-30vs SKY GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesChristopher Hailes / Taylor Weir vs Chad Cleveland / Chris Smith6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesClint Cook vs Michael Margolf6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Pardun / Jason Rutkofsky vs Andrew Davis / Craig Bouck6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChris Chang / Russell Sedmak vs Scott Hermansen / David Garrison1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-06-23vs GPTC REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesMichael Pardun / Michael Donovan vs Noah Wasserman / David Junta4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesClint Cook vs Joshua Ingalls6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesFrankie Newman / Taylor Weir vs Matthew Shafroth / Kenneth MacDonald6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRussell Sedmak / Chris Chang vs Jason Hladik / Viktor Bojilov6-1, 6-2
2026-06-16vs DTC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichael Pardun / Brewster Boyd vs Louis Bissette / Milan Doshi0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJason Rutkofsky vs Christopher Smith3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Donovan / Clint Cook vs James Sutton / Neil Nowak4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChris Chang / Christopher Hailes vs Joe Tartell / Jason Curran6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-09vs WP NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesTaylor Weir / Christopher Hailes vs Seamus Doyle / Hicham Zhiri6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesClint Cook vs John Davis6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichael Donovan / Brewster Boyd vs Pil Kim / Mario Crobu6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesChris Chang / Russell Sedmak vs Konstantin Gradushy / Michael Lim6-0, 6-0
2026-06-02vs CP REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesChristopher Hailes / Russell Sedmak vs Patrick Miller / Matthew Gallagher6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJason Rutkofsky vs Fritz Gale6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Donovan / Clint Cook vs Gary Beck / John Randall7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTaylor Weir / Brewster Boyd vs Philip Silkoff / Jerry Saltzman6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Christopher Hailes
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.56
Chris Chang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Frankie Newman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Jason Rutkofsky
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
Brewster Boyd
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Glenn Rippey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Michael Pardun
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Taylor Weir
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Russell Sedmak
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Clint Cook
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Michael Donovan
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Pardun + Christopher Hailes5266% games+11.5% vs expected
Russell Sedmak + Chris Chang7067% games+7.8% vs expected
Michael Pardun + Jason Rutkofsky6161% games+6.9% vs expected
Christopher Hailes + Chris Chang10168% games+6.3% vs expected
Michael Donovan + Michael Pardun2346% games−2.4% vs expected
Clint Cook + Michael Donovan3344% games−3.6% vs expected
Michael Donovan + Glenn Rippey213 matchesnot enough data
Frankie Newman + Taylor Weir303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christopher Hailes
112W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Chris Chang
48W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Frankie Newman
119W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Jason Rutkofsky
33W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%56%43%
3.48
3.5
Brewster Boyd
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Glenn Rippey
55W–62L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Michael Pardun
109W–102L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Taylor Weir
27W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Russell Sedmak
33W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Clint Cook
15W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Michael Donovan
12W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.