Teams

WP GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs CP REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesGregg Found / Mark Helman vs Matthew Gallagher / JACK DONNELLY6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesScott Ziemke vs Fritz Gale6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChris Cramer / TODD WINSTON vs Michael Evans / Gene Martinez6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNathan Fuzi / Wade Westphal vs Gary Beck / John Randall4-6, 6-7
2026-07-07vs CM BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesScott Ziemke / Chris Merman vs Taylor Weir / Frankie Newman1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesGregg Found vs Clint Cook7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPeter Sheldon / Mark Helman vs Michael Donovan / Glenn Rippey4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNathan Fuzi / Wade Westphal vs Russell Sedmak / Jason Rutkofsky2-6, 1-6
2026-06-30vs GPTC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesScott Ziemke / Chris Cramer vs Joshua Rosenberg / David Junta7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChris Merman vs Carlos Hinrichsen6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMark Helman / Peter Sheldon vs Kyungsoo Jeong / Kenneth MacDonald5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWade Westphal / Eric Johnson vs Peter Sarnataro / Viktor Bojilov6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-23vs WP NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChris Cramer / Chris Merman vs Seamus Doyle / Hicham Zhiri6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMark Helman vs Mario Crobu2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTODD WINSTON / Peter Sheldon vs John Davis / Neal OConnor6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNathan Fuzi / Eric Johnson vs Konstantin Gradushy / Michael Lim4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-16vs CACM BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesScott Ziemke / Chris Merman vs John Anadiotis / James Brinson7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGregg Found vs Michael Vieau6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMark Helman / TODD WINSTON vs Jay Logan / David Duganne3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNathan Fuzi / Eric Johnson vs Kyle Evashevski / Jay Rael6-2, 6-2
2026-06-09vs SKY GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesScott Ziemke / Gregg Found vs Bentley Hodges / Mike Turman6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChris Merman vs Chris Smith6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTODD WINSTON / Chris Cramer vs Scott Hermansen / Aaron Duke6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEric Johnson / Nathan Fuzi vs Michael Margolf / Andrew Davis6-1, 6-2
2026-06-02vs DTC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesChris Merman / Gregg Found vs Milan Doshi / Christopher Jackson4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesScott Ziemke vs Joe Tartell4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Sheldon / Mark Helman vs Neil Nowak / Jason Curran6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNathan Fuzi / Wade Westphal vs Jason Sindler / Daniel Yamagishi3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Chris Merman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Eric Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Scott Ziemke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Gregg Found
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.36
Mark Helman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.33
TODD WINSTON
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Chris Cramer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Peter Sheldon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Nathan Fuzi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Wade Westphal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Sheldon + Mark Helman3247% games−7.4% vs expected
Chris Cramer + Chris Merman4259% gamesnot enough data
Scott Ziemke + Gregg Found314 matchesnot enough data
Chris Merman + Gregg Found224 matchesnot enough data
Eric Johnson + Nathan Fuzi303 matchesnot enough data
Scott Ziemke + Chris Merman213 matchesnot enough data
Wade Westphal + Nathan Fuzi033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Merman
27W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.42
Eric Johnson
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Scott Ziemke
35W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Gregg Found
16W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Mark Helman
9W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
TODD WINSTON
28W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Chris Cramer
15W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Peter Sheldon
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Nathan Fuzi
14W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Wade Westphal
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.