Teams

Vineyards -

2022 Collier Adult 18 & Over Spring · 4.5 Women Adult 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoan Lancellot / Nicole Paller vs Valerie Khammash / Kalika Shelar1-6, 3-6
2022-04-26Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRebecca Tessitore / Stefanie Decker vs Valerie Khammash / Kalika Shelar3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Lancellot / Carolyn Matje vs Renea Tucker / Amanda Myers5-7, 3-6
2022-04-19Split 11
W#2 DoublesStefanie Decker / Rebecca Tessitore vs Alexa Schuck / Laura Jolly6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristy Cardina / Carolyn Matje vs Valerie Khammash / Kalika Shelar2-6, 4-6
2022-04-12vs COLLIER / CampisiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRebecca Tessitore / Stefanie Decker vs Kalika Shelar / Alexa Schuck6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSara Wachs / Lynn Johns vs Valerie Khammash / Nannette Staropoli6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-05vs COLLIER / CampisiLost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzanne McAllister / Lisa Kresse vs Kalika Shelar / Laura Jolly6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSara Wachs / Stefanie Decker vs Kari Gustafson / Diana Wong1-6, 3-6
2022-03-29vs COLLIER / CampisiWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Luray / Sara Wachs vs Jennifer Hansen / Renea Tucker7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLynne Hancock / Lynn Johns vs Kari Gustafson / Diana Wong5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Tessitore / Beth Occiano vs Valerie Khammash / Karen Morand6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-22vs COLLIER / CampisiWon 20
W#2 DoublesSara Wachs / Lisa Luray vs Ann Campisi / Nannette Staropoli6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSuzanne McAllister / Eileen Reynolds vs Valerie Khammash / Karen Morand5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Lisa Kresse
published
4.24
Lynn Johns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Suzanne McAllister
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.16
Sara Wachs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.14
Flora Rodriguez
published 4.5
4.14
Rebecca Tessitore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.00
Karen Defiore
published
4.00
Kristy Cardina
published
4.00
MacKenzie Kraft
published
3.96
Carolyn Matje
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Karolina Klarowicz
published
Joan Lancellot
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lynne Hancock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Wachs + Lynn Johns19956% games−2.9% vs expected
Suzanne McAllister + Sara Wachs11459% gamesnot enough data
Sara Wachs + Carolyn Matje3246% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Johns + Rebecca Tessitore404 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne McAllister + Lynn Johns213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Tessitore + Carolyn Matje123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Kresse
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
Lynn Johns
114W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Suzanne McAllister
73W–29L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
Sara Wachs
147W–89L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Flora Rodriguez
10W–24L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
Rebecca Tessitore
67W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
4.14
Karen Defiore
16W–32L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
4.00
Kristy Cardina
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
4.00
MacKenzie Kraft
26W–43L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
4.00
4
Carolyn Matje
59W–63L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
Karolina Klarowicz
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Joan Lancellot
21W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynne Hancock
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.