Teams

JOHNSON RANCH 18MX7.0D

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-23vs ED MITCHELL PK 18MX7.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesAlex Kopack / Lawrence Carlos vs Denise Canacari / Jon Dresser1-6, 5-7
2025-02-10vs HAL BARTHOLOMEW PK 18MX7.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmma Patterson / Lawrence Carlos vs Chris Pham / Imelda Ismael6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-13vs ED MITCHELL PK 18MX7.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Newby / Lawrence Carlos vs Nicole Roseveare / Dani Weinstein3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-12vs HAL BARTHOLOMEW PK 18MX7.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesFaye Patterson / Kevin Yi Liu vs Thienan Nguyentan / Hoang-Johnny To6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Emma Patterson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.09
Faye Patterson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.05
Jennifer Pagador
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Ronnie Yamanaka
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Alex Kopack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Laura Newby
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Derrick Ross
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
Barbara Sanchez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Jeff Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.45
Lance Chih
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Lawrence Carlos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Gordon Owyang
published
3.26
Lauren Pugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Avtar Johal
published 3
2.79
Kevin Yi Liu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emma Patterson
20W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
Faye Patterson
25W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.09
Jennifer Pagador
24W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
4.05
Ronnie Yamanaka
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.85
4
Alex Kopack
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Newby
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
3.5
Derrick Ross
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
3.5
Barbara Sanchez
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Jeff Patterson
14W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Lance Chih
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Lawrence Carlos
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Gordon Owyang
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Lauren Pugh
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3
Avtar Johal
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Kevin Yi Liu
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.