Teams

HAL BARTHOLOMEW PK 18MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-10vs JOHNSON RANCH 18MX7.0DWon 21
W#1 DoublesWanda Hasadsri / Felizaldy Salimo vs Jeff Patterson / Barbara Sanchez6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBaldomero Lasam / Jane Fieldhouse vs Lance Chih / Emily Rodriguez6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChris Pham / Imelda Ismael vs Emma Patterson / Lawrence Carlos2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-12vs JOHNSON RANCH 18MX7.0DWon 21
W#1 DoublesJane Fieldhouse / Alex Bychkoviak vs Ronnie Yamanaka / Derrick Ross6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJasper Golingho / Norabel Obejas vs Jeff Patterson / Emily Rodriguez6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesThienan Nguyentan / Hoang-Johnny To vs Faye Patterson / Kevin Yi Liu3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Jasper Golingho
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.89
Alex Bychkoviak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Wanda Hasadsri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Hoang Truong
published
3.42
Imelda Ismael
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Norabel Obejas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Alkhan Ismael
published 3.5
3.24
Jane Fieldhouse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
2.87
Joanne Huang
published
2.75
Emily Lasam
published
Felizaldy Salimo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Hoang-Johnny To
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rey Chatto
published
Sadie Ortigoza
published
Thienan Nguyentan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jasper Golingho
19W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Alex Bychkoviak
27W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Wanda Hasadsri
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Hoang Truong
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Imelda Ismael
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Norabel Obejas
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
3.5
Alkhan Ismael
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Fieldhouse
29W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Lourdes Bote-Zingapan
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Joanne Huang
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Emily Lasam
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Felizaldy Salimo
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Hoang-Johnny To
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rey Chatto
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sadie Ortigoza
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thienan Nguyentan
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.