Teams

Team 2 Set 2 Win

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-10vs Team 1 Net WorthLost 01
L#3 DoublesYulia Taylor / Vanessa Ogilvie vs Jena Olsen / Connie McGowan4-6, 2-6
2024-03-03vs Team 4 MocoNovaLost 02
L#1 DoublesYulia Taylor / Heather Viar vs Michele Davis / Alexei Haughom5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAliye Roth / Catalina Tafur vs Laurie Cohen / Karna Hyman2-6, 1-6
2024-02-25vs Team 3 BABsWon 10
W#1 DoublesVanessa Ogilvie / Yulia Taylor vs Stephanie Anderson / Nancy Scully6-1, 6-3
2024-02-18vs Team 1 Net WorthLost 01
L#1 DoublesAliye Roth / Catalina Tafur vs Kelly Domson / Malini Sekhar3-6, 0-6
2024-02-16vs Team 4 MocoNovaLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatalina Tafur / Tuyet Cahill vs Michele Davis / Erika Trost2-6, 0-6
2024-01-28vs Team 1 Net WorthSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHeather Viar / Yulia Taylor vs Malini Sekhar / Lola Georgi3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTuyet Cahill / Catalina Tafur vs Kelly Domson / Amy Bundy0-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Heather Viar
published 4.5
4.20
Yulia Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.99
Tuyet Cahill
published
3.94
Aileen Jones
published 4
3.93
Catalina Tafur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.90
Kim Miller
published
Angie Wong
published 4
3.66
Betsy Johnston
published 4
3.65
Tracey White
published
3.44
Lori Reed
published
Vanessa Ogilvie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Miller + Aileen Jones3349% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Heather Viar
239W–145L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Yulia Taylor
49W–74L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.20
Tuyet Cahill
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Aileen Jones
47W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
4.5
Catalina Tafur
114W–169L career · 4 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.93
Kim Miller
42W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.90
4
Angie Wong
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Betsy Johnston
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Tracey White
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Lori Reed
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.44
Vanessa Ogilvie
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.