Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Kathy Maratukulam
published
3.37
Sabrina McQueen
published
3.35
Rebecca Kay
published
3.33
Maria Rueda
published
3.33
Audra Lutter
published 3.5
3.29
Brigitte Shaw
published 3.5
3.28
April Mundy
published 3.5
3.27
Aliza Grosh
published 3.5
3.24
Dana Andrew
published 3.5
3.18
Melissa Bach
published
3.14
Michaela Katari
published
3.12
Rosalynd Zahiri
published 3.5
3.10
Teri Frangie
published
3.06
Mary Soe
published
3.02
Melissa Sano
published
3.00
Kirsten Lang
published
2.81
Christina Tapp
published 3
2.44
Miwa Yoneyama
published
Robin Hultgren
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brigitte Shaw + Audra Lutter224 matchesnot enough data
Christina Tapp + Mary Soe224 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Kay + Kathy Maratukulam404 matchesnot enough data
Rosalynd Zahiri + Brigitte Shaw213 matchesnot enough data
Christina Tapp + Melissa Bach213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Maratukulam
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Sabrina McQueen
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
Rebecca Kay
24W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Maria Rueda
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Audra Lutter
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Brigitte Shaw
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
April Mundy
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Aliza Grosh
9W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Dana Andrew
10W–23L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Melissa Bach
39W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.18
Michaela Katari
46W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
3.5
Rosalynd Zahiri
94W–58L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.12
Teri Frangie
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Mary Soe
16W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
Melissa Sano
7W–18L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Kirsten Lang
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.00
3
Christina Tapp
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Cara Mia Barnacascel
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Miwa Yoneyama
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robin Hultgren
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.