Teams

CP:Salomon Slice Girls 40+ 4.0:Salomon

2025 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2

18 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-02-23vs OGT:Phoenix 4.0:Campbell/MartinWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeborah Salomon / Rezan Zia vs Grace Smith / Debbie Cannavino6-1, 2-3
W#2 DoublesLaurie Hoffman / Laura Cramer vs Casey Rosenblum / Allison Gibbs6-3, 6-4
2025-02-09vs SOL:Hit and Run:TannerLost 12
L#1 DoublesSylvie Roisin / Linda Lee vs Nora Holmes / Mary Mondello6-7, 2-1
L#1 SinglesJamie Behr vs Lauren Rosen0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Lazar / Laura Cramer vs Rachel Kilcullen / Katherine Curtin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-26vs KH:Serves You Right:Meyer/WoodruffLost 04
L#1 DoublesSylvie Roisin / Linda Lee vs Erin Harris / Jan Strack6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLaurie Hoffman vs Jori Meyer4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Cramer / Lauren Lazar vs Christina OHagan / Christine Barkley1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFlavia Lodato / Danielle Muller-Yoo vs Agnes Temerowski / Stacy Branca6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesSylvie Roisin / Linda Lee vs Sejal Vora / Veronica Coach6-4, 5-7
W#1 SinglesRezan Zia vs Diana Kolev4-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLiz Fleischman / Lauren Lazar vs Samantha Nick / Dawn Hone6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLaura Cramer / Flavia Lodato vs Jana Platina / Felicia DeSanto1-6, 0-6
2024-12-15vs NC:40 Love:Weitz/CampoLost 12
L#1 DoublesSylvie Roisin / Linda Lee vs Janet Lawless / Sophie Porcelli6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Hoffman / Laura Cramer vs Susanna Nichols / Colleen Campo6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDanielle Muller-Yoo / Flavia Lodato vs Jennifer Weitz / Tatiane Canady6-7, 6-6
2024-12-08vs SOL:Hit and Run:TannerLost 04
L#1 DoublesSylvie Roisin / Linda Lee vs Roge Nesbitt / Victoria Madonna6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJamie Behr vs Lauren Rosen1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRezan Zia / Dao Engle vs Sharon Ollivierre / Mary Mondello3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLauren Lazar / Nanette Koryn vs Lourdes Marti / Pamela Fuehrer3-6, 3-6
2024-11-23vs NC:40 Love:Weitz/CampoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLauren Lazar / Jelena Spyropoulos vs Sara Watts / Janet Lawless6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJamie Behr vs Susanna Nichols3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLiz Fleischman / Dao Engle vs Sophie Porcelli / Michele Halem6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Cramer / Amy Silberfein vs Maureen Ruckman / Jennifer Weitz6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2024-11-17vs OGT:Phoenix 4.0:Campbell/MartinSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLauren Lazar / Rezan Zia vs Grace Smith / Rebecca le Neve Foster2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJamie Behr vs Kaisa Elovaara4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSylvie Roisin / Linda Lee vs Ali Campbell / Amy Kaufman6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaurie Hoffman / Amy Silberfein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesLauren Lazar / Jelena Spyropoulos vs Erin Harris / Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRezan Zia vs Jori Meyer6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNanette Koryn / Sylvie Roisin vs Kristen Pugno / Karen Bogdan6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLaurie Hoffman / Laura Cramer vs Emelyn Northway / Cornelia Toothaker6-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesRezan Zia / Jelena Spyropoulos vs Mary Sniffen / Michele Miller6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJamie Behr vs Jillian Muro3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesNanette Koryn / Liz Fleischman vs Scottie Guerney / Keira Treanor6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 4.0 W - 2
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP:Salomon Slice Girls 40+ 4.0:Salomon09122248342
2OGT:Phoenix 4.0:Campbell/Martin0992450359
3KH:New Ads:Gaillard010221131342
4OGT:Game, Set, Match:Myers/Corrado010211532321
5NC:40 Love:Weitz/Campo010261334360
6TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick010231535293
7SOL:Hit and Run:Tanner010221840351
8KH:Serves You Right:Meyer/Woodruff010201843370
9CP:Net Gains 40+ Winter:das Neves/Sweet010181745369
104S:Dream Team:Margulies/East010142148377
11MIT:40 BBs:DeAngelis010122557427

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Sylvie Roisin
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.88
Lauren Lazar
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.87
Jelena Spyropoulos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Rezan Zia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.79
Laurie Hoffman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Amy Silberfein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Dao Engle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Laura Cramer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.69
Liz Fleischman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Deborah Salomon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Linda Lee
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.63
Cindy Havens
published 4
3.55
Emily Schwartz
published
3.52
Nanci Kirshner
published 4
3.40
Flavia Lodato
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.38
Jamie Behr
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.27
Danielle Muller-Yoo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Nanette Koryn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Cramer + Jamie Behr13069% games+10.5% vs expected
Linda Lee + Sylvie Roisin563456% games+6.6% vs expected
Nanci Kirshner + Lauren Lazar5162% games+5.8% vs expected
Laura Cramer + Laurie Hoffman901961% games+4.7% vs expected
Nanette Koryn + Liz Fleischman5452% games+2.3% vs expected
Linda Lee + Lauren Lazar4352% games+2.2% vs expected
Lauren Lazar + Jelena Spyropoulos10654% games+1.2% vs expected
Nanci Kirshner + Deborah Salomon141454% games+0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sylvie Roisin
160W–144L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
Lauren Lazar
175W–85L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.88
Jelena Spyropoulos
76W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
Rezan Zia
24W–39L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Laurie Hoffman
279W–92L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Amy Silberfein
15W–46L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Dao Engle
36W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Cramer
295W–127L career · 8 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Liz Fleischman
70W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Deborah Salomon
75W–85L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Linda Lee
202W–103L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Cindy Havens
49W–37L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Emily Schwartz
104W–36L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
4
Nanci Kirshner
93W–105L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Flavia Lodato
77W–48L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jamie Behr
165W–105L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Danielle Muller-Yoo
103W–93L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Nanette Koryn
65W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.