Teams

SOL:Hit and Run:Tanner

2025 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2

29 players · average NTRP 4.11 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-02-22vs NC:40 Love:Weitz/CampoLost 13
L#1 DoublesLori Calat / Carole Allers vs Amanda Bryan / Sara Watts2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKim Mixer vs Tatiane Canady3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRoge Nesbitt / Victoria Madonna vs Amy Tucci / Charlotte Allen3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Wells / Mary Mondello vs Jennifer Weitz / Susanna Nichols6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesNora Holmes / Mary Mondello vs Sylvie Roisin / Linda Lee6-7, 2-1
W#1 SinglesLauren Rosen vs Jamie Behr6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRoge Nesbitt / Gina Pacheco vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRachel Kilcullen / Katherine Curtin vs Lauren Lazar / Laura Cramer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-01-26vs OGT:Game, Set, Match:Myers/CorradoSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSharon Ollivierre / Mary Mondello vs Lisa Dawson / Felicia DeSanto6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLauren Rosen vs Diana Kolev2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVictoria Madonna / Roge Nesbitt vs Dawn Hone / Leah McVey6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAnn Horowitz / Brigitte Tanner vs Elizabeth Luth / Mariko Abdel-Rahman0-6, 1-6
2025-01-12vs OGT:Phoenix 4.0:Campbell/MartinWon 40
W#1 DoublesRoge Nesbitt / Victoria Madonna vs Grace Smith / Shannon Weber6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLauren Rosen vs Tori Brennan6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Mondello / Nora Holmes vs Debbie Cannavino / Ali Campbell2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKayoko Ito / Yumi Nagahama vs Chase Haynes English / Claudia Trulli6-3, 6-4
2024-12-15vs KH:Serves You Right:Meyer/WoodruffSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMary Mondello / Nora Holmes vs Christina OHagan / Kristen Pugno6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLauren Rosen vs Emelyn Northway6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLeslie Lombino / Gina Pacheco vs Sarah Konecke / Erin Harris1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Horowitz / Kim Mixer vs Maren Nelson / Rebecca Soskin6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesRoge Nesbitt / Victoria Madonna vs Sylvie Roisin / Linda Lee2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Rosen vs Jamie Behr6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSharon Ollivierre / Mary Mondello vs Rezan Zia / Dao Engle6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLourdes Marti / Pamela Fuehrer vs Lauren Lazar / Nanette Koryn6-3, 6-3
2024-11-17vs NC:40 Love:Weitz/CampoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLara Haffenreffer / Carole Allers vs Amanda Bryan / Sara Watts4-6, 5-5
W#1 SinglesLauren Rosen vs Sophie Porcelli7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRoge Nesbitt / Victoria Madonna vs Susanna Nichols / Susanna Daniel6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPamela Fuehrer / Gina Pacheco vs Jennifer Weitz / ADRIENNE FULK4-6, 1-6
2024-11-02vs OGT:Game, Set, Match:Myers/CorradoLost 13
L#1 DoublesVictoria Madonna / Roge Nesbitt vs Sejal Vora / Leah McVey3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLauren Rosen vs Diana Kolev5-7, 0-5
L#2 DoublesNora Holmes / Cynthia Curry vs Mary Sniffen / Michele Miller1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Wells / Kim Mixer vs Mariko Abdel-Rahman / Elizabeth Luth6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-20vs OGT:Phoenix 4.0:Campbell/MartinLost 13
L#1 DoublesLori Calat / Lara Haffenreffer vs Grace Smith / Rebecca le Neve Foster6-7, 3-3
L#1 SinglesLauren Rosen vs Kaisa Elovaara6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRandi Siegel / Laura Zarba vs Casey Rosenblum / Allison Gibbs6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLourdes Marti / Leslie Lombino vs Olga Orgielewicz / Miran Robarts2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-10-06vs KH:Serves You Right:Meyer/WoodruffSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCarole Allers / Lori Calat vs Karen Bogdan / Christine Barkley7-5, 6-5
L#1 SinglesKim Mixer vs Kristen Pugno4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNora Holmes / Mary Mondello vs Tory Woodruff / Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKristen Woll / Leslie Lombino vs Sarah Konecke / Agnes Temerowski0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 4.0 W - 2
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP:Salomon Slice Girls 40+ 4.0:Salomon09122248342
2OGT:Phoenix 4.0:Campbell/Martin0992450359
3KH:New Ads:Gaillard010221131342
4OGT:Game, Set, Match:Myers/Corrado010211532321
5NC:40 Love:Weitz/Campo010261334360
6TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick010231535293
7SOL:Hit and Run:Tanner010221840351
8KH:Serves You Right:Meyer/Woodruff010201843370
9CP:Net Gains 40+ Winter:das Neves/Sweet010181745369
104S:Dream Team:Margulies/East010142148377
11MIT:40 BBs:DeAngelis010122557427

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 28 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Amanda Fialk
published 4.5
4.25
Laura Chilton
published
4.05
Wendy Boiardi
published 4.5
4.00
Carole Allers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Lori Calat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
Lara Haffenreffer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Roge Nesbitt
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.83
Mary Mondello
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.82
Kayoko Ito
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Lauren Rosen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.75
Victoria Madonna
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Sharon Ollivierre
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Rachel Kilcullen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Pamela Fuehrer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Lourdes Marti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Yumi Nagahama
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Randi Siegel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Kim Mixer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Elizabeth Wells
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Nora Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.50
Laura Zarba
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Gina Pacheco
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Cynthia Curry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Kristen Woll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Ann Horowitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Katherine Curtin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Brigitte Tanner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Ophira Cukierman
published
Leslie Lombino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Fuehrer + Lourdes Marti7162% games+15.2% vs expected
Laura Zarba + Laura Chilton6166% games+14.9% vs expected
Pamela Fuehrer + Gina Pacheco261158% games+6.8% vs expected
Laura Chilton + Lori Calat10164% games+5.3% vs expected
Katherine Curtin + Gina Pacheco5554% games+3.6% vs expected
Ophira Cukierman + Ann Horowitz5451% games+3.2% vs expected
Brigitte Tanner + Kristen Woll3243% games+1.9% vs expected
Mary Mondello + Brigitte Tanner341953% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amanda Fialk
76W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
4.47
Laura Chilton
190W–57L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.25
4.5
Wendy Boiardi
130W–85L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.05
4.5
Carole Allers
186W–140L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
4.5
Lori Calat
163W–86L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.96
4
Lara Haffenreffer
113W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Roge Nesbitt
218W–147L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Mary Mondello
237W–161L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Kayoko Ito
33W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Lauren Rosen
123W–75L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Victoria Madonna
223W–148L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Sharon Ollivierre
249W–185L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Rachel Kilcullen
25W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Pamela Fuehrer
143W–84L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Lourdes Marti
160W–92L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Yumi Nagahama
71W–59L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Randi Siegel
18W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.57
Kim Mixer
43W–81L career · 4 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Elizabeth Wells
93W–98L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Nora Holmes
181W–161L career · 5 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Laura Zarba
138W–128L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Gina Pacheco
176W–149L career · 3 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.48
4
Cynthia Curry
25W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Kristen Woll
45W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
4
Ann Horowitz
139W–104L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
4
Katherine Curtin
165W–120L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Brigitte Tanner
124W–163L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Ophira Cukierman
53W–61L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Leslie Lombino
42W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.