Teams

UPTA54FF/Haun/HollyTree

2025 Fun Fall 54 & Over - GTL · 3.5 Women FF

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-03vs UPTAFF54/Fountain/Keowee KeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesTaunya Haun / Jean Kleis vs Aimee Fountain / Peggy Braswell2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoan Close / Lisa Bertling vs Charlotte Cobos / Lisa Morris5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJeania Smith / Michelle Weston vs Mary Metzler / Jean Zavertnik6-3, 7-6
2025-11-19vs UPTA54FF/Hendricks/KrocLost 03
L#1 DoublesTaunya Haun / Holli Mayher vs Tricia Socash / Tracy Churdar3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Weston / Melanie Greene vs Sarah Hendricks / Ann Ashmore1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKimberly Bond / Leslie Carrico vs Elizabeth McDonough / Merle Dunson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-11-12vs UPTA54FF/Thomas/Keowee KeyLost 12
W#1 DoublesTaunya Haun / Joan Close vs Wendy Jakszta / Dana Loring6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Bond / Jean Kleis vs Sharon Thomas / Sandra Franklin2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Erbacher / Jeania Smith vs Patricia Robertson / Patricia Joy2-6, 3-6
2025-11-05vs UPTA54FF/McCarthy/ReserveWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoan Close / Kimberly Bond vs Gayle Burrer / Susan Boures6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTaunya Haun / Holli Mayher vs Mary Forbes / Kim Smentek6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJeania Smith / Lisa Bertling vs Michele Evanski / Linda Davis6-0, 7-5
2025-10-22vs UPTA54FF/Mendes/SpindletreeLost 12
L#1 DoublesJean Kleis / Joan Close vs Jacquie Eddy / Suzanne Pauley0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJeania Smith / Melanie Greene vs Tarina Mendes / Rachel Ashley6-7, 3-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Bertling / Catherine Erbacher vs Sherry Gibson / Sherry Koban6-3, 6-4
2025-10-15vs UPTA54FF/Joffe/ThornbladeLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Bertling / Joan Close vs Sally Seaver / Amy Williams3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelanie Greene / Catherine Erbacher vs Pamela Finigan / Cathy Spitzmiller6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTaunya Haun / Jean Kleis vs Angela Joffe / Sena Claxton6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-08vs UPTA54FF/Lawlor/KrocWon 30
W#1 DoublesTaunya Haun / Jeania Smith vs Lyn Boyd / Lisa Hughes6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJoan Close / Jean Kleis vs Elizabeth Vandiver / Anne Williams6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKimberly Bond / Holli Mayher vs Mara Townsend / Lauren McCullough7-6, 6-3
2025-10-01vs UPTA54FF/Johnson/KrocLost 03
L#1 DoublesJean Kleis / Taunya Haun vs Kim McFall / Gypsy Denzine1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKimberly Bond / Holli Mayher vs Anne Smith / Jennie Morgan5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeania Smith / Catherine Erbacher vs Wanda Cummins / Jane Trexler4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Catherine Erbacher
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Jeania Smith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.15
Taunya Haun
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.07
Leslie Carrico
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Melanie Greene
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Kimberly Bond
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.97
Lisa Bertling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Holli Mayher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Michelle Weston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Jean Kleis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Joan Close
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Maryanne Spivey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holli Mayher + Kimberly Bond4354% games+10.4% vs expected
Joan Close + Jean Kleis5455% games+8.6% vs expected
Holli Mayher + Maryanne Spivey112439% games+2.6% vs expected
Taunya Haun + Jean Kleis3646% games−5.5% vs expected
Kimberly Bond + Joan Close1640% games−6.4% vs expected
Taunya Haun + Melanie Greene2443% games−12.7% vs expected
Michelle Weston + Jeania Smith224 matchesnot enough data
Joan Close + Lisa Bertling134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Erbacher
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeania Smith
12W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
Taunya Haun
26W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Leslie Carrico
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.07
Melanie Greene
14W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Kimberly Bond
16W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Lisa Bertling
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Holli Mayher
26W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.94
Michelle Weston
22W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Jean Kleis
28W–41L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Joan Close
19W–40L career · 6 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.85
Maryanne Spivey
16W–41L career · no lines in 2025
0%17%83%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.