Teams

UPTA54FF/McCarthy/Reserve

2025 Fun Fall 54 & Over - GTL · 3.5 Women FF

16 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-03vs UPTA54FF/Blide/Keowee KeyWon 10
W#2 DoublesSherry Morgan / Beverly Gibbs vs Liz Turnure / Judy Griffiths6-4, 6-4
2025-11-20vs UPTA54FF/Joffe/ThornbladeLost 03
L#1 DoublesGayle Burrer / Susan Boures vs Jane Miller / Denise Ruby5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBobbi Nailor / Kim Smentek vs Erin Byxbee / Amy Williams3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary McCarthy / Sherry Morgan vs Angela Joffe / Amy Cupples4-6, 4-6
2025-11-19vs UPTA54FF/Lawlor/KrocWon 10
W#3 DoublesBobbi Nailor / Stephanie Mitchell vs Jill Wolf / Mara Townsend4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-11-12vs UPTA54FF/Johnson/KrocWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Boures / Lisa Apsey vs Kim McFall / Kim Tyler2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKim Smentek / Bobbi Nailor vs Andrea Johnson / Carole Dresden6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Forbes / Michele Evanski vs Kimberly Halley / Anne Smith6-2, 6-4
2025-11-05vs UPTA54FF/Haun/HollyTreeLost 03
L#1 DoublesGayle Burrer / Susan Boures vs Joan Close / Kimberly Bond4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Forbes / Kim Smentek vs Taunya Haun / Holli Mayher2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Evanski / Linda Davis vs Jeania Smith / Lisa Bertling0-6, 5-7
2025-10-22vs UPTA54FF/Thomas/Keowee KeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesSherry Morgan / Gayle Burrer vs Melissa Coles / Sandra Franklin3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBobbi Nailor / Susan Boures vs Christine Woerz / Johnna Neri1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Davis / Mary McCarthy vs Patricia Robertson / Dana Loring2-6, 3-6
2025-10-21vs UPTA54FF/Hendricks/KrocWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Apsey / Stephanie Mitchell vs Sheila Reitler / Ann Ashmore2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-15vs UPTAFF54/Fountain/Keowee KeyLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Mitchell / Kim Smentek vs Donna Bayless / Robin Elder6-7, 4-6
2025-10-01vs UPTA54FF/Mendes/SpindletreeLost 01
L#3 DoublesCandice Limousin / Beverly Gibbs vs Eva Mellert / Lisa Cain6-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Gayle Burrer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Bobbi Nailor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.06
Lisa Apsey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Beverly Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Susan Boures
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Kim Smentek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Sherry Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Stephanie Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Michele Evanski
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.79
Kay King
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Candice Limousin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Kathy Mendel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Debra Michalovsky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Linda Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Forbes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sandra Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Smentek + Bobbi Nailor6260% games+5.3% vs expected
Kay King + Candice Limousin2348% games−10.0% vs expected
Kathy Mendel + Candice Limousin2443% games−10.0% vs expected
Susan Boures + Gayle Burrer134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Boures + Bobbi Nailor314 matchesnot enough data
Sherry Morgan + Lisa Apsey033 matchesnot enough data
Kim Smentek + Michele Evanski123 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Mendel + Michele Evanski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gayle Burrer
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3
Bobbi Nailor
18W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Lisa Apsey
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Beverly Gibbs
74W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Susan Boures
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Kim Smentek
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Sherry Morgan
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.88
3
Stephanie Mitchell
18W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Michele Evanski
11W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Kay King
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Candice Limousin
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Kathy Mendel
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Debra Michalovsky
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Linda Davis
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Forbes
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Lewis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.