Teams

NIN SB Combo 7.5 Men: SBRC Striegel

NIN SB Combo - Weekend · NIN SB Combo 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-11-20vs NIN SB Combo 7.5 Men: SBRC PontiusLost 12
L#1 DoublesMartin Klubeck / Kevin Leonard vs Nicholas Catapano / Mark Janson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlex Boyer / Tim Denniston vs Nipun Sodhi / Qasim Asghar6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Roth / Michael Desch vs Joerg Burfien / Gabriel Montero1-6, 1-6
2022-11-13vs NIN SB Combo 7.5 Men: SBRC PontiusLost 03
L#1 DoublesNathan Dew / Kevin Leonard vs Gabriel Montero / Robert Pickering7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Roth / Aaron Striegel vs Joerg Burfien / Nipun Sodhi1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Desch / Ajit Pai vs Michael Cincoski / Ryan Wise2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKevin Leonard / Nathan Dew vs Nicholas Catapano / Mark Janson6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDan Bardayan / Roger Brady vs Barry Pontius / Steve Bibi5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLuis Fargier / Michael Desch vs Joerg Burfien / Nipun Sodhi6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesLuis Fargier / Roger Brady vs Barry Pontius / Nicholas Catapano6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJohn McGreevy / Martin Klubeck vs Michael Cincoski / Qasim Asghar6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlex Boyer / Nathan Dew vs Nipun Sodhi / Robert Pickering7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesLuis Fargier / Dan Bardayan vs Steve Bibi / Ryan Wise4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn McGreevy / Tim Denniston vs Gabriel Montero / Joerg Burfien6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDeron Gerber / Aaron Striegel vs Barry Pontius / Nicholas Catapano2-6, 2-6
2022-10-16vs NIN SB Combo 7.5 Men: SBRC PontiusLost 12
L#1 DoublesKevin Leonard / Tim Denniston vs Gabriel Montero / Robert Pickering1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLuis Fargier / Dan Bardayan vs Steve Bibi / Barry Pontius6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Roth / Martin Klubeck vs Qasim Asghar / Michael Cincoski3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesJohn McGreevy / Nathan Dew vs Steve Bibi / Ryan Wise5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Leonard / Tim Denniston vs Nipun Sodhi / Mark Janson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Desch / Luis Fargier vs Michael Cincoski / Joerg Burfien7-6, 6-4
2022-09-25vs NIN SB Combo 7.5 Men: SBRC PontiusSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn McGreevy / Nathan Dew vs Steve Bibi / Qasim Asghar7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Roth / Martin Klubeck vs Nipun Sodhi / Ryan Wise5-7, 5-7
W#1 DoublesJohn McGreevy / Dan Bardayan vs Joerg Burfien / Nipun Sodhi6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKevin Leonard / Tim Denniston vs Michael Cincoski / Mark Janson6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NIN SB Combo 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN SB Combo 7.5 Men: SBRC Striegel54131433267
2NIN SB Combo 7.5 Men: SBRC Pontius45141332263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Alex Boyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Dan Bardayan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.33
Aaron Striegel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Ajit Pai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Tim Denniston
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Michael Desch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeffrey Roth
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Luis Fargier
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Martin Klubeck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nathan Dew
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Denniston + Dan Bardayan5653% gamesnot enough data
Martin Klubeck + Tim Denniston7169% gamesnot enough data
Aaron Striegel + Jeffrey Roth2542% gamesnot enough data
Michael Desch + Luis Fargier303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alex Boyer
26W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Dan Bardayan
57W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Aaron Striegel
37W–81L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Ajit Pai
18W–25L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tim Denniston
62W–69L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Michael Desch
28W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Jeffrey Roth
31W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Luis Fargier
8W–3L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Martin Klubeck
38W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nathan Dew
30W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.