Teams

Smash Squad

2026 OKCAdult 18 & Over Day League · 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesNikki Bruster / Kendra Augustine vs Megan Holzhausen / Moira Parham2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMaureen Culbreath vs Kimberly Stout2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesMaureen Culbreath / Chelsea Mayer vs Kimberly Stout / Enaas Hamed0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesNikki Bruster vs Megan Holzhausen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKendra Augustine / Katie Mcelvany vs Samantha Ward / Nicole Tran2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMaureen Culbreath / Chelsea Mayer vs Kimberly Stout / Moira Parham0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKendra Augustine / Katie Mcelvany vs Tiffany Vernon / Mylinh Tran2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesSuzette Grillot / Katie Mcelvany vs Samantha Ward / Nicole Tran6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNikki Bruster vs Megan Holzhausen6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKendra Augustine / Rebecca Myers vs Katharine Regens / Marissa Smith5-7, 0-6
L#1 DoublesSuzette Grillot / Nikki Bruster vs Kimberly Stout / Mylinh Tran2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMaureen Culbreath vs Samantha Ward7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Mcelvany / Kendra Augustine vs Kimberly Greenlee / Katharine Regens6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMaureen Culbreath / Rebecca Myers vs Katharine Regens / Tiffany Vernon3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNikki Bruster vs Nicole Tran6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKendra Augustine / Katie Mcelvany vs Kimberly Stout / Moira Parham0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OKC Day/ Holtzhausen and Parham/Lobsters601441096
2Smash Squad0641429190

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.05 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.36
Nikki Bruster
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.18
Suzette Grillot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Chelsea Mayer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.99
Maureen Culbreath
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
1.90
Katie Mcelvany
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
1.85
Kendra Augustine
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kendra Augustine + Katie Mcelvany044 matchesnot enough data
Chelsea Mayer + Maureen Culbreath033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nikki Bruster
6W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
Suzette Grillot
12W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Chelsea Mayer
4W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Maureen Culbreath
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Katie Mcelvany
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Kendra Augustine
0W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.