Teams

OKC Day/ Holtzhausen and Parham/Lobsters

2026 OKCAdult 18 & Over Day League · 2.5

12 players · average NTRP / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-17vs Smash SquadWon 20
W#1 DoublesMegan Holzhausen / Moira Parham vs Nikki Bruster / Kendra Augustine6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKimberly Stout vs Maureen Culbreath6-2, 6-1
2025-10-03vs Smash SquadWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Stout / Enaas Hamed vs Maureen Culbreath / Chelsea Mayer6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMegan Holzhausen vs Nikki Bruster2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSamantha Ward / Nicole Tran vs Kendra Augustine / Katie Mcelvany6-2, 6-3
2025-09-26vs Smash SquadWon 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Stout / Moira Parham vs Maureen Culbreath / Chelsea Mayer6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTiffany Vernon / Mylinh Tran vs Kendra Augustine / Katie Mcelvany6-2, 6-0
2025-09-19vs Smash SquadWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamantha Ward / Nicole Tran vs Suzette Grillot / Katie Mcelvany4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMegan Holzhausen vs Nikki Bruster7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKatharine Regens / Marissa Smith vs Kendra Augustine / Rebecca Myers7-5, 6-0
2025-09-12vs Smash SquadWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Stout / Mylinh Tran vs Suzette Grillot / Nikki Bruster6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSamantha Ward vs Maureen Culbreath6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKimberly Greenlee / Katharine Regens vs Katie Mcelvany / Kendra Augustine3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-09-05vs Smash SquadWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatharine Regens / Tiffany Vernon vs Maureen Culbreath / Rebecca Myers6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesNicole Tran vs Nikki Bruster1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Stout / Moira Parham vs Kendra Augustine / Katie Mcelvany6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OKC Day/ Holtzhausen and Parham/Lobsters601441096
2Smash Squad0641429190

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.45
Moira Parham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.39
Kimberly Stout
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.33
Mylinh Tran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.26
Katharine Regens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.19
Nicole Tran
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.19
Megan Holzhausen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.17
Marissa Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.04
Kimberly Greenlee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.98
Enaas Hamed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.85
Samantha Ward
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Joy Baresel
published
Tiffany Vernon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Moira Parham + Kimberly Stout4170% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Moira Parham
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
Kimberly Stout
10W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Mylinh Tran
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Katharine Regens
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
Nicole Tran
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Megan Holzhausen
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Marissa Smith
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Kimberly Greenlee
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Enaas Hamed
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Samantha Ward
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Joy Baresel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tiffany Vernon
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.