Teams

CP RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-01vs MC BLACKWon 32
W#1 DoublesMichelle Topf / Sally Morris vs Pamela Bokusky / Denise Belk1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Luna vs Cyndy Besselievre2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIrene Mendelsberg / Lauren Perry vs Robin Behrstock / Kristin Danford4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCarleigh Krug vs Megan Fischbach6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKate Strecker / Laura Pells vs Karen Greenwood / Susan Beaudoin6-3, 6-4
2021-05-25vs CP BLACKLost 14
W#1 DoublesCaitlin Finn / Kate Strecker vs Carrie Weingart / Jennifer Davis6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCarleigh Krug vs Juliana Okulski1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSally Morris / Laura Pells vs Catherine Safieddine / Marie Nguyen7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKimberly Gillock vs Kimberly Allen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesShannon McKay / Lauren Perry vs Katherine Ferraro / Jennifer Mele1-6, 0-6
2021-05-13vs GTC REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesCaitlin Finn / Kate Strecker vs Amanda Iapalucci / Courtney Krusemark6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCarleigh Krug vs Brooke Dennis4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShannon McKay / Michelle Topf vs Lindsay Morgan / Hollie Lubchenco6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJennifer Luna vs Gabriela Parker2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Perry / Irene Mendelsberg vs Heather Ringelman / Rachel Heise6-2, 6-3
2021-05-11vs NJ GOLDWon 32
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Finn / Kate Strecker vs Paloma Vazquez / Jordan Soldano1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Luna vs Anne Torkelson6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaura Pells / Sally Morris vs Jessica Ouwerkerk / Martha Williams4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKimberly Gillock vs Debra Brown6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesIrene Mendelsberg / Lauren Perry vs Shellie Hall / Jenna Marvin2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-09vs NJ REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesCaitlin Finn / Kate Strecker vs Heather Roggendorf / Michelle Phenicie6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCarleigh Krug vs Kristin Williams3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Perry / Irene Mendelsberg vs Ajyra JONES / Charlene Bailey6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJennifer Luna vs Sydney Stroup6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMichelle Topf / Shannon McKay vs Karen Payne / Kim Grogan2-6, 1-6
2021-05-04vs BP REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Finn / Kate Strecker vs Denise Hernandez / Andrea Philleo6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCarleigh Krug vs Charlotte Rhoad4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMichelle Topf / Sally Morris vs Victoria Barstow / Deanna Espejo6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKimberly Gillock vs Victoria Bull6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShannon McKay / Laura Pells vs Rosemary Garcia / Yukiko Brooks6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Sally Morris
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.31
Irene Mendelsberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Caitlin Finn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Kate Strecker
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.10
Lauren Perry
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.04
Michelle Topf
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.87
Kimberly Gillock
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Bria Smith
published
Carleigh Krug
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Jennifer Luna
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Laura Pells
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Risa Wolf-Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Morris + Michelle Topf7358% games+12.8% vs expected
Lauren Perry + Irene Mendelsberg291158% games+4.7% vs expected
Caitlin Finn + Kate Strecker7753% games−0.5% vs expected
Caitlin Finn + Michelle Topf21041% games−8.1% vs expected
Lauren Perry + Michelle Topf314 matchesnot enough data
Caitlin Finn + Sally Morris314 matchesnot enough data
Irene Mendelsberg + Sally Morris314 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Perry + Sally Morris123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sally Morris
26W–10L career · 4 lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
4.53
4.5
Irene Mendelsberg
67W–40L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Caitlin Finn
30W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Kate Strecker
22W–20L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.28
Lauren Perry
89W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Michelle Topf
53W–65L career · 4 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Kimberly Gillock
66W–52L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.87
Bria Smith
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Carleigh Krug
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jennifer Luna
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Pells
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Risa Wolf-Smith
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.