Teams

BP RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.31 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-01vs GTC REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesDawn Stoner / Denise Hernandez vs Courtney Krusemark / Amanda Iapalucci5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCharlotte Rhoad vs Gabriela Parker6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesVictoria Barstow / Rosemary Garcia vs Tonya Laden / Susan Conway3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesAndrea Philleo vs Heidi Halus6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Victoria Bull vs Melissa Doidge / Rachel Heise4-6, 6-7
2021-05-31vs MC BLACKLost 23
L#1 DoublesVictoria Bull / Rosemary Garcia vs Pamela Bokusky / Denise Belk4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAndrea Philleo vs Cyndy Besselievre3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDeanna Espejo / Victoria Barstow vs Karen Greenwood / Vicki Emch6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDawn Stoner vs Megan Fischbach6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaren Kappius / Yukiko Brooks vs Anne Pielage / Margaret Harwood6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-28vs CP BLACKLost 14
L#1 DoublesDenise Hernandez / Dawn Stoner vs Marie Nguyen / Catherine Safieddine1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCharlotte Rhoad vs Chandra Aitchison1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Kappius / Andrea Philleo vs Katherine Ferraro / Jennifer Mele2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesVictoria Bull vs Kimberly Allen0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDeanna Espejo / Victoria Barstow vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-25vs NJ REDWon 32
L#1 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Denise Hernandez vs Karen Payne / Kim Grogan6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCharlotte Rhoad vs Kristin Williams6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRosemary Garcia / Victoria Bull vs Michelle Phenicie / Sydney Stroup6-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDawn Stoner vs Elisa Dannemiller6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeanna Espejo / Yukiko Brooks vs Charlene Bailey / Lisa Tran6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-04vs CP REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesDenise Hernandez / Andrea Philleo vs Caitlin Finn / Kate Strecker4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCharlotte Rhoad vs Carleigh Krug6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesVictoria Barstow / Deanna Espejo vs Michelle Topf / Sally Morris7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesVictoria Bull vs Kimberly Gillock3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRosemary Garcia / Yukiko Brooks vs Shannon McKay / Laura Pells7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2021-04-27vs NJ GOLDLost 14
L#1 DoublesRosemary Garcia / Victoria Bull vs Jessica Ouwerkerk / Leslie Hanna5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCharlotte Rhoad vs Anne Torkelson6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDenise Hernandez / Yukiko Brooks vs Jenna Marvin / Shellie Hall4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDawn Stoner vs Paloma Vazquez6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVictoria Barstow / Deanna Espejo vs Martha Williams / Kaye Becker4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Victoria Barstow
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Irene Arguelles
published 4.5
4.22
Charlotte Rhoad
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Denise Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.09
Andrea Philleo
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.09
Rosemary Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.96
Yukiko Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.88
Deanna Espejo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Victoria Bull
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Dawn Stoner
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Karen Kappius
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yukiko Brooks + Deanna Espejo11458% games+2.7% vs expected
Rosemary Garcia + Andrea Philleo2346% games−0.9% vs expected
Denise Hernandez + Irene Arguelles191949% games−1.5% vs expected
Rosemary Garcia + Yukiko Brooks31144% games−2.6% vs expected
Victoria Barstow + Deanna Espejo4345% games−2.8% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Irene Arguelles2639% games−9.7% vs expected
Victoria Bull + Rosemary Garcia0735% games−13.0% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Yukiko Brooks2634% games−14.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Victoria Barstow
69W–63L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Irene Arguelles
23W–34L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Charlotte Rhoad
19W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Denise Hernandez
55W–73L career · 5 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Andrea Philleo
52W–75L career · 5 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
4.09
Rosemary Garcia
17W–49L career · 5 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Yukiko Brooks
145W–118L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Deanna Espejo
62W–32L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Victoria Bull
41W–81L career · 6 lines in 2021
24%75%<1%
3.59
Dawn Stoner
13W–11L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Kappius
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.