Teams

1LIFE-BEARD 4.5+ men win singles SEM F

2025 aSEM WINTER TEAM SINGLES · 2025 MEN 4.5+ WINTER SINGLES SEM

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 SinglesJose Benavente vs Cheng Gong4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMario Lorber vs Nichola Stojanov1-6, 2-6
2025-03-16Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMartin Bak vs Justin Collins1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesEdgar Zambrano vs Rishi Patel0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLogan Beard vs Kevin Madden6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesMario Lorber vs Gary Jessee2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMario Lorber vs Surya Prakash Manepalli0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJose Benavente vs David Lai7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLogan Beard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesEdgar Zambrano vs Jack Callaghan3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMario Lorber vs Cheng Gong1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLogan Beard vs Brian Nguyen7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMartin Bak vs Justin Collins1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesEdgar Zambrano vs Julian Olejnik0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJack Swan vs David Atallah5-7, 2-5
W#3 SinglesJose Benavente vs Trenton Townsend6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLogan Beard vs Surya Prakash Manepalli6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2025 MEN 4.5+ WINTER SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
13EAST-KEAN 4.5+ men win singles SEM F7119511142
26FAC-MAHMOOD 4.5+ men win singles SEM F6216818172
34DEER-TOWNSEND 4.5+ men win singles SEM F44111326215
41LIFE-BEARD 4.5+ men win singles SEM F3591531239
55BLOOM-MANEPALLI 4.5+ men win singles SEM F0851936240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Logan Beard
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.23
Martin Bak
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.85
Nicholas Ludwig
published
Edgar Zambrano
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jack Swan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jose Benavente
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Mario Lorber
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Robert Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicholas Ludwig + Logan Beard9357% games+4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Logan Beard
50W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.58
4.5
Martin Bak
167W–105L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Nicholas Ludwig
30W–25L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.85
Edgar Zambrano
39W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jack Swan
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jose Benavente
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mario Lorber
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Walker
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.