Teams

3EAST-KEAN 4.5+ men win singles SEM F

2025 aSEM WINTER TEAM SINGLES · 2025 MEN 4.5+ WINTER SINGLES SEM

8 players · average NTRP 4.75 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesJulian Olejnik vs Trenton Townsend6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLouis Wyre vs Kevin Madden7-5, 3-3
W#1 SinglesJulian Olejnik vs Johan Mahmood6-0, 6-0
2025-03-16Won 10
W#2 SinglesPeter Wagner vs Robert Walker7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAustin Huynh vs Surya Prakash Manepalli6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMarlon Leone vs Merrick Bay6-2, 5-2
W#2 SinglesPeter Wagner vs Noah Gedrimas6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLouis Wyre vs Trenton Townsend6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPeter Wagner vs Cheng Gong6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesJohn Andrew vs Jack Callaghan5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBrian Nguyen vs Logan Beard5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJulian Olejnik vs Edgar Zambrano6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAustin Huynh vs Xiaoqiang Li6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJulian Olejnik vs Surya Prakash Manepalli6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2025 MEN 4.5+ WINTER SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
13EAST-KEAN 4.5+ men win singles SEM F7119511142
26FAC-MAHMOOD 4.5+ men win singles SEM F6216818172
34DEER-TOWNSEND 4.5+ men win singles SEM F44111326215
41LIFE-BEARD 4.5+ men win singles SEM F3591531239
55BLOOM-MANEPALLI 4.5+ men win singles SEM F0851936240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.66
Austin Huynh
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.39
Peter Wagner
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.38
Julian Olejnik
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Louis Wyre
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Marlon Leone
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.04
Brian Nguyen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
3.95
John Andrew
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Rishi Patel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Austin Huynh + Julian Olejnik6262% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Austin Huynh
77W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.66
Peter Wagner
52W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Julian Olejnik
129W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Louis Wyre
107W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
Marlon Leone
24W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
27%72%<1%
4.08
5
Brian Nguyen
41W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.04
John Andrew
11W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.95
Rishi Patel
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.