Teams

LCTA40/Autry/I'On

USTA 40 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 6.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
3.06
Meghan Webster
published
2.96
Alicia Fox
published 3
2.96
Athan Fokas
published 3
2.89
Emily Calcagno
published 3
2.89
Roxanne Tedford
published
2.81
Cleary Simpson
published 3
2.81
Grace Cowan
published 3
2.79
Ryan Tedford
published
David Koch
published 3
George Simpson
published 3
2.57
Kathryn Hinton
published
2.50
Krissie Smith
published
Jay Millard
published
Joe Williams
published
Patrick Young
published
Rob Autry
published
Wenda Millard
published
William Hautt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roxanne Tedford + Ryan Tedford6352% games+4.7% vs expected
Patrick Young + Anna-Liese Anderson303 matchesnot enough data
Wenda Millard + Jay Millard033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anna-Liese Anderson
92W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
Meghan Webster
54W–43L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Alicia Fox
38W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Athan Fokas
25W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Emily Calcagno
55W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
Roxanne Tedford
33W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Cleary Simpson
22W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Grace Cowan
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
Ryan Tedford
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
3
David Koch
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
George Simpson
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathryn Hinton
9W–40L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.57
Krissie Smith
16W–30L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Jay Millard
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joe Williams
30W–40L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patrick Young
26W–34L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rob Autry
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wenda Millard
1W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Hautt
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.