Teams

Smash Sisters

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 3.15 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-05-20vs Causing a RacquetLost 02
L#2 DoublesSheri Wippel / Katrina Basye vs Valencia Bilyeu / Stacey Novak4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Rusk / Nikki Whiting vs Kristen Ewing / Nikki Reynolds1-6, 2-6
2021-05-18vs Court JunkiesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Haskell / Cindy Tuck vs Priscilla Routson / Mary Hyde6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKatrina Basye / Sheri Wippel vs Diane Cercle / Dawn Lafrades0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-05-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesCindy Tuck / Kelly Haskell vs Dyan Goulet / Molly Otter6-4, 7-6
2021-05-11vs SwingersWon 20
W#2 DoublesKatrina Basye / Sheri Wippel vs Anna Arrants / Leslie Brown6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Rusk / Nikki Whiting vs Vanessa Holstine / Sarah Donaldson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-05-04vs Hot FlashesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKatrina Basye / Sheri Wippel vs Patricia Hoffman / ADRA KIPPER7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Rusk / Nikki Whiting vs Maria Garatea / Christine Cannon4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-04-20vs Diva ThunderWon 20
W#1 DoublesCindy Tuck / Kelly Haskell vs Deanna Schmidt / Lisa Veis6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKatrina Basye / Sheri Wippel vs Joanne Soroka / Katie Limani6-1, 6-1
2021-04-13vs Net SistersLost 02
L#2 DoublesKatrina Basye / Sheri Wippel vs Sue Markuson / Rose Radke7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Rusk / Nikki Whiting vs Portia Rauer / Kelly Tonkin1-6, 4-6
2021-04-08vs Baby’s got BackhandWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Rusk / Nikki Whiting vs Laura Cobb / Andrea Straub6-3, 6-2
2021-04-06vs Like a Fine WineSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCindy Tuck / Kelly Haskell vs Suzanne Hickok / Kerry Freeman6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNikki Whiting / Jennifer Rusk vs Melissa Waine-Cunliffe / Kim Custer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-04-18vs Like a Fine WineWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatrina Basye / Christina Elder vs Kim Custer / Erin Retelle6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Dawn Crochet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Christina Elder
published 3.5
3.26
Fariss Mcgee
published 3.5
3.21
Maggie Horvat
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Nelda Denton
published
2.77
Cheri Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
Cindy Tuck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Sheri Wippel
published 3
2.73
Nikki Whiting
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Brenda Bourn
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.33
Carole Dobrowolski
published 2.5
Jennifer Rusk
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 8% · published
Katrina Basye
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Kelly Haskell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Margaret McNulty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michele Rice
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fariss Mcgee + Dawn Crochet251655% games+2.2% vs expected
Carole Dobrowolski + Cheri Nelson282848% games+1.2% vs expected
Nelda Denton + Fariss Mcgee5746% games−3.1% vs expected
Carole Dobrowolski + Christina Elder3345% games−7.9% vs expected
Katrina Basye + Sheri Wippel423850% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Rusk + Nikki Whiting131751% gamesnot enough data
Michele Rice + Christina Elder161257% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Crochet + Kelly Haskell61841% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dawn Crochet
170W–181L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Christina Elder
63W–71L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Fariss Mcgee
79W–93L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Maggie Horvat
32W–25L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Nelda Denton
88W–106L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Cheri Nelson
43W–48L career · 13 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Cindy Tuck
22W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Sheri Wippel
112W–119L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Nikki Whiting
26W–41L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Brenda Bourn
62W–48L career · 18 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
2.5
Carole Dobrowolski
33W–53L career · no lines in 2021
0%90%10%
2.33
Jennifer Rusk
58W–84L career · 12 lines in 2021
not enough data
Katrina Basye
59W–39L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelly Haskell
78W–129L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Margaret McNulty
44W–32L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michele Rice
19W–26L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.