Teams

GJTC VLAMBDIN

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - WS

11 players · average NTRP 2.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-15vs GJTC LLEWISLost 13
L#1 DoublesValerie Lambdin / Shelly Hurt vs Vanessa Young / Celeste Quarnberg0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCynthia Bulgier vs Monica Hudson2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDebbie Sutherland / Amy Swonger vs Danika Holt / Michelle Blanck6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Ludlam / Terry Chase vs Cathy Dokoupil / Theresa Heer3-6, 3-6
2025-07-07vs GJTC WSMITHLost 13
W#1 DoublesValerie Lambdin / Shelly Hurt vs Emma Wood / Michele Rewold6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCynthia Bulgier vs Jennifer Bradfield4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebbie Sutherland / Kim Kintz vs Suzy Keith / Kelly Morse2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMaggie Coleman / Terry Chase vs ROBIN MARTIN / Lucy Sanders1-6, 1-6
2025-06-30vs GJTC SMABLEYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesValerie Lambdin / Shelly Hurt vs Missy DeRose / Lisa Westhoff6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCynthia Bulgier vs Ann Wright6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebbie Sutherland / Rhonda Repshire vs Amy Urbach / Kim Murray6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAmy Swonger / Maggie Coleman vs Vicki Gottwals / Emily Hayes5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-23vs GJTC WGECHTERSplit 22
W#1 DoublesValerie Lambdin / Shelly Hurt vs Jessica Rowell / Johnna Langley6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRhonda Repshire vs Mary Sterling6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Ludlam / Debbie Sutherland vs Wendi Gechter / Nancy Needham6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Swonger / Eileen Arja vs Kate Wender / Christi Reece3-6, 1-6
2025-06-13vs GJTC SMABLEYWon 31
L#1 DoublesMaggie Coleman / Shelly Hurt vs Vicki Gottwals / Lisa Westhoff4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesDebbie Sutherland vs Ann Wright4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Kintz / Kathy Ludlam vs Stephanie Mabley / Emily Hayes7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesValerie Lambdin / Amy Swonger vs Deedra Shear / Jennifer Steele6-0, 7-6
2025-06-09vs GJTC WSMITHLost 13
W#1 DoublesKim Kintz / Rhonda Repshire vs Suzy Keith / Kelly Morse6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCynthia Bulgier vs Jennifer Bradfield4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesValerie Lambdin / Kathy Ludlam vs ROBIN MARTIN / Michelle Weckenbrock6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTerry Chase / Shelly Hurt vs Michele Rewold / Emma Wood3-6, 2-6
2025-06-02vs GJTC LLEWISLost 04
L#1 DoublesMaggie Coleman / Kim Kintz vs Lauren Lewis / Natalie Shpigel1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesDebbie Sutherland vs Vanessa Young1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShelly Hurt / Amy Swonger vs Cathy Dokoupil / Theresa Heer2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTerry Chase / Kathy Ludlam vs Danika Holt / Celeste Quarnberg2-6, 2-6
2025-05-28vs GJTC WGECHTERSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRhonda Repshire / Debbie Sutherland vs Jessica Rowell / Tammy Kinnes7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCynthia Bulgier vs Wendi Gechter6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmy Swonger / Maggie Coleman vs Tammi Brophy / Kate Wender6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Ludlam / Terry Chase vs Nancy Needham / Mary Sterling0-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Rhonda Repshire
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.74
Maggie Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.74
Kathy Ludlam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Cynthia Bulgier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.69
Kim Kintz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Eileen Arja
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Amy Swonger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Debbie Sutherland
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
Shelly Hurt
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Terry Chase
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Valerie Lambdin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Hurt + Valerie Lambdin2442% games−5.6% vs expected
Eileen Arja + Amy Swonger033 matchesnot enough data
Maggie Coleman + Kathy Ludlam123 matchesnot enough data
Terry Chase + Kathy Ludlam123 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Lambdin + Kathy Ludlam213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rhonda Repshire
13W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Maggie Coleman
20W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Kathy Ludlam
15W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Cynthia Bulgier
8W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Kim Kintz
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Eileen Arja
3W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
2.5
Amy Swonger
5W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Debbie Sutherland
3W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelly Hurt
2W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Terry Chase
1W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Valerie Lambdin
10W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.