Teams

GJTC WGECHTER

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - WS

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-14vs GJTC WSMITHLost 13
L#1 DoublesTammy Kinnes / Johnna Langley vs Jennifer Bradfield / Merrill Hunt6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMary Sterling vs Michele Rewold2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Needham / Christi Reece vs Kelly Morse / Hadassa Berger1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJessica Rowell / Kate Wender vs Lucy Sanders / Emma Wood6-4, 6-0
2025-07-07vs GJTC SMABLEYLost 12
L#1 DoublesWendi Gechter / Christi Reece vs Missy DeRose / Ann Wright7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKate Wender / Nancy Needham vs Stephanie Mabley / Kim Murray1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Rowell / Tammy Kinnes vs Deedra Shear / Vicki Gottwals6-1, 7-5
2025-06-30vs GJTC LLEWISLost 04
L#1 DoublesTammi Brophy / Wendi Gechter vs Monica Hudson / Natalie Shpigel4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesChristi Reece vs Vanessa Young2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Kinnes / Johnna Langley vs Michelle Blanck / Cathy Dokoupil4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Rowell / Mary Sterling vs Danika Holt / Kimberly Langston3-6, 1-6
2025-06-23vs GJTC VLAMBDINSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJessica Rowell / Johnna Langley vs Valerie Lambdin / Shelly Hurt2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMary Sterling vs Rhonda Repshire0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesWendi Gechter / Nancy Needham vs Kathy Ludlam / Debbie Sutherland4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKate Wender / Christi Reece vs Amy Swonger / Eileen Arja6-3, 6-1
2025-06-16vs GJTC WSMITHSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTammy Kinnes / Nancy Needham vs Lucy Sanders / Jennifer Bradfield3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesTammi Brophy vs Hadassa Berger0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJessica Rowell / Kate Wender vs Emma Wood / Merrill Hunt6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Sterling / Christi Reece vs Kelly Morse / Michele Rewold2-6, 3-6
2025-06-10vs GJTC LLEWISLost 04
L#1 DoublesTammi Brophy / Wendi Gechter vs Theresa Heer / Lauren Lewis2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJohnna Langley vs Monica Hudson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Needham / Jessica Rowell vs Danika Holt / Natalie Shpigel0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMary Sterling / Tammy Kinnes vs Kimberly Langston / Vanessa Young0-6, 0-6
2025-06-09vs GJTC SMABLEYWon 31
L#1 DoublesTammi Brophy / Christi Reece vs Stephanie Mabley / Ann Wright5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesWendi Gechter vs Jennifer Steele2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTammy Kinnes / Nancy Needham vs Vicki Gottwals / Emily Hayes6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKate Wender / Johnna Langley vs Amy Urbach / Deedra Shear6-3, 6-4
2025-05-28vs GJTC VLAMBDINSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJessica Rowell / Tammy Kinnes vs Rhonda Repshire / Debbie Sutherland7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWendi Gechter vs Cynthia Bulgier2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTammi Brophy / Kate Wender vs Amy Swonger / Maggie Coleman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Needham / Mary Sterling vs Kathy Ludlam / Terry Chase6-0, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Kate Wender
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Tammy Kinnes
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.81
Nancy Needham
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.75
Tammi Brophy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.72
Jessica Rowell
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.67
Wendi Gechter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.66
Christi Reece
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Johnna Langley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.32
Mary Sterling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Kinnes + Jessica Rowell8357% games+7.1% vs expected
Kate Wender + Jessica Rowell5355% games+7.0% vs expected
Wendi Gechter + Tammi Brophy3745% games+1.0% vs expected
Tammy Kinnes + Johnna Langley1442% games−0.9% vs expected
Kate Wender + Tammy Kinnes224 matchesnot enough data
Kate Wender + Johnna Langley224 matchesnot enough data
Christi Reece + Johnna Langley224 matchesnot enough data
Kate Wender + Christi Reece303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Wender
23W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Tammy Kinnes
27W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Nancy Needham
7W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Tammi Brophy
10W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Jessica Rowell
18W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Wendi Gechter
18W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
2.67
3
Christi Reece
12W–23L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
Johnna Langley
8W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
Mary Sterling
0W–35L career · 6 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.