Teams

GSCC SILVER

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-25vs GSCC PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeghan Hegberg / Kristen Foote vs Sasha Enewold / Amy Roggie7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-19vs BASALT REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeghan Hegberg / Kate McRaith vs Corin Brucker / Karen Price3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-08-26vs GSCC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesMegan Hayes / Erin Zalinski vs Anne Sale / Heather Howe1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeghan Hegberg / Kate McRaith vs Shannon Francis-Pienaar / Ksana Oglesby6-4, 6-2
2024-08-19vs HCC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Zalinski / Megan Hayes vs Shannon Fedrizzi / Jaime Kellogg7-5, 6-3
2024-08-12vs CROWN REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Zalinski / Megan Hayes vs Judi Simecek / Kathy Robinson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Heidi Paul
published
3.29
Meghan Hegberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Kristen Foote
published
3.21
Briar Schreiber
published 3.5
3.17
Lily Freiborg
published
3.09
Erin Zalinski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Brady Emens
published 3
2.89
Kristina Kelty
published
2.86
Kate McRaith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Hegberg + Erin Zalinski5452% games+1.5% vs expected
Meghan Hegberg + Kate McRaith044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heidi Paul
10W–23L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Meghan Hegberg
59W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Kristen Foote
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Briar Schreiber
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Lily Freiborg
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Erin Zalinski
87W–105L career · 3 lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
3.09
3
Brady Emens
11W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.92
Kristina Kelty
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
Kate McRaith
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.