Teams

CROWN RED

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-23vs GSCC PURPLELost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Capri / Julie Glen vs Susie Demers / Miranda Wagler2-6, 3-6
2024-09-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesJudi Simecek vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-09vs GSCC PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJudi Simecek / Kathy Robinson vs Miranda Wagler / Sasha Enewold6-3, 7-5
2024-08-26vs BASALT REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Capri / Judi Simecek vs Lauren Noble / Molly Jones6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2024-08-19vs GSCC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJudi Simecek / Kelly Capri vs Keely Eberly / Shannon Francis-Pienaar7-5, 6-4
2024-08-12vs GSCC SILVERLost 02
L#1 DoublesJudi Simecek / Kathy Robinson vs Erin Zalinski / Megan Hayes3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Capri / Julie Glen vs Lily Freiborg / Briar Schreiber6-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Tatum Rees
published
3.24
Tsvetana Mawicke
published
3.20
Kathy Robinson
published
3.13
Andrea Olson
published 3.5
3.10
Judi Simecek
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.95
Kimberly Welsh
published
2.93
Kelly Capri
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Julie Glen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judi Simecek + Kathy Robinson71145% games+6.8% vs expected
Judi Simecek + Kelly Capri31044% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Olson + Kathy Robinson224 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Olson + Kelly Capri134 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Welsh + Judi Simecek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tatum Rees
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
Tsvetana Mawicke
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Kathy Robinson
14W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.20
3.5
Andrea Olson
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Judi Simecek
49W–80L career · 5 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Kimberly Welsh
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Kelly Capri
31W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.93
Julie Glen
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.