Teams

CORTA-CC

2026 CORTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Spring · Women 9.0 Combined

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-28vs CORTA/Alison CripeLost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Gunnels / Helen Neal vs Julie Cronise / Denise Richardson4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGigi Lennon / Theresa Ward vs Alison Cripe / Valerie Pattillo3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCharlotte Parmer / Eileen Barrs vs Susan Harris / Patricia Clevenger2-6, 2-6
2026-03-28vs CORTA/Alison CripeLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Parmer / Gigi Lennon vs Denise Richardson / Julie Cronise2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHelen Neal / Eileen Barrs vs Robin Huskisson / Valerie Pattillo2-6, 3-6
2026-03-28vs CORTA/Alison CripeLost 03
L#1 DoublesEileen Barrs / Helen Neal vs Valerie Pattillo / Robin Huskisson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGigi Lennon / Cathy Gunnels vs Alison Cripe / Penny Dillon0-3
L#3 DoublesRose Himmelreich / Lois Vincent vs Lynn Pauley / Emily Mansour3-6, 2-6
2026-03-28vs CORTA/Alison CripeLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Parmer / Eileen Barrs vs Patricia Clevenger / Susan Harris2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRose Himmelreich / Lois Vincent vs Lynn Pauley / Emily Mansour3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 9.0 Combined have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Gigi Lennon
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.53
Charlotte Parmer
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.38
Helen Neal
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.35
Theresa Ward
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Eileen Barrs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Cathy Gunnels
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Lois Vincent
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rose Himmelreich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Neal + Cathy Gunnels2352% games+0.7% vs expected
Theresa Ward + Gigi Lennon3352% games−2.9% vs expected
Theresa Ward + Helen Neal6458% games−4.1% vs expected
Charlotte Parmer + Eileen Barrs111048% games−12.5% vs expected
Gigi Lennon + Cathy Gunnels3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gigi Lennon
46W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.54
4
Charlotte Parmer
17W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Helen Neal
27W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Theresa Ward
21W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.35
Eileen Barrs
16W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
3.29
4
Cathy Gunnels
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.26
Lois Vincent
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rose Himmelreich
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.