Teams

CORTA/Alison Cripe

2026 CORTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Spring · Women 9.0 Combined

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-28vs CORTA-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Cronise / Denise Richardson vs Cathy Gunnels / Helen Neal6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlison Cripe / Valerie Pattillo vs Gigi Lennon / Theresa Ward6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Harris / Patricia Clevenger vs Charlotte Parmer / Eileen Barrs6-2, 6-2
2026-03-28vs CORTA-CCWon 20
W#1 DoublesDenise Richardson / Julie Cronise vs Charlotte Parmer / Gigi Lennon6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobin Huskisson / Valerie Pattillo vs Helen Neal / Eileen Barrs6-2, 6-3
2026-03-28vs CORTA-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesValerie Pattillo / Robin Huskisson vs Eileen Barrs / Helen Neal6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlison Cripe / Penny Dillon vs Gigi Lennon / Cathy Gunnels3-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Pauley / Emily Mansour vs Rose Himmelreich / Lois Vincent6-3, 6-2
2026-03-28vs CORTA-CCWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatricia Clevenger / Susan Harris vs Charlotte Parmer / Eileen Barrs6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLynn Pauley / Emily Mansour vs Rose Himmelreich / Lois Vincent6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Women 9.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CORTA/Alison Cripe40120049

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Patricia Clevenger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.16
Denise Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Robin Huskisson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.13
Alison Cripe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
Emily Mansour
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Julie Cronise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Lynn Pauley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Valerie Pattillo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Penny Dillon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Pauley + Emily Mansour404 matchesnot enough data
Robin Huskisson + Julie Cronise213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Clevenger
13W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Denise Richardson
63W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
Robin Huskisson
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Alison Cripe
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
Emily Mansour
18W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
Julie Cronise
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.79
Lynn Pauley
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Valerie Pattillo
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Penny Dillon
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.