Teams

Fall Winners/ Naples Grande - Wilson

2023 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.10 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-05vs Naples Bay Resort - LevineWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisbeth Wilson / Susan Levine vs Ellen Schmidt / Barbara Tilley6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-11-28vs Vineyards - BowenkampWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelley Lindes / Lisbeth Wilson vs Jennifer Johnson / Kathleen Iverson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-11-21vs Grey Oaks - WerchekSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelley Lindes / Terry Dirr vs Peggy Hogan / Anne Marie Russell6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLisbeth Wilson / Laura Groark vs Veronica Howell / Carolyn Romano7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2022-11-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTerry Dirr / Lisa Ruffolo vs Debra Olsen / Gina Taft6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-11-07vs Pelican Bay Park - NavarroWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisbeth Wilson / Beth Jones vs Susanne Navarro / Tina Albright6-3, 6-4
2022-10-31vs Cambier - L.GustWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Jones / Susan Levine vs Kristy Cardina / Debbie Moses6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-25vs Naples Grande - J. FrankWon 10
W#3 DoublesGail Hayton / Lisbeth Wilson vs Ann Manning / Gail Kennedy6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Terry Dirr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Kelley Lindes
published
3.87
Christina Zajac
published 4
3.82
Cheryl Cohen
published 4.5
3.79
Debi Reed
published 4
Beth Jones
published 4
Gail Hayton
published
Judy Howell
published
Laura Groark
published
Lisa Ruffolo
published
Lisbeth Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Peggy Strakosch
published
Susan Levine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisbeth Wilson + Susan Levine8557% gamesnot enough data
Debi Reed + Lisa Ruffolo314 matchesnot enough data
Debi Reed + Christina Zajac314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Levine + Kelley Lindes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Terry Dirr
323W–169L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
Kelley Lindes
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Christina Zajac
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
4.5
Cheryl Cohen
70W–51L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.82
4
Debi Reed
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Beth Jones
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gail Hayton
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Judy Howell
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Groark
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Ruffolo
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisbeth Wilson
63W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peggy Strakosch
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Levine
72W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.