Teams

Vineyards - Bowenkamp

2023 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesCari Shaw / Christine Turk vs Mary Ann Benzing / Kate Wagner6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Kathleen Iverson vs Kelley Lindes / Lisbeth Wilson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-11-21vs Cambier - L.GustLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Buckman / Rae Fairfield vs Sheila MacNicol / Terri Tucci7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebra Bowenkamp / Kathleen Iverson vs Susan Allen / Amber Hill2-6, 2-6
2022-11-14vs Players Club - WautersLost 01
L#1 DoublesCari Shaw / Christine Turk vs Cathy de Bear / Jill Wauters3-6, 1-6
2022-11-07vs Grey Oaks - WerchekSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAnnette Brennan / Rae Fairfield vs Margaret Werchek / Veronica Howell7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChristine Turk / Kathleen Iverson vs Julie Puntney / Marie Wilson2-6, 3-6
2022-10-31vs GreyHawk - HulbertSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAnnette Brennan / Cari Shaw vs Michelle Maggal / Angelika Dean6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Nancy Nilson vs Mercedes Baumann / Carol Halliday1-6, 3-6
2022-10-29vs Pelican Bay Park - NavarroSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Jennifer Johnson vs Susanne Navarro / Karey Hogan6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Nilson / Sindi Sanzica vs Angela Aline / Janice Forner3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-10-24vs Naples Reserve - HugginsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Jennifer Johnson vs Maria Blakslee / Diane Cahill3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Annette Brennan
published 4
3.75
Emily Buckman
published 4
3.74
Rae Fairfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Cari Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Sindi Sanzica
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Kathleen Iverson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Christine Turk
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cari Shaw + Sindi Sanzica3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annette Brennan
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Emily Buckman
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Rae Fairfield
51W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Cari Shaw
28W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.61
Sindi Sanzica
104W–135L career · 1 line in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
Kathleen Iverson
50W–73L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Christine Turk
26W–32L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.