Teams

GEPTA/Uraga/18&over/4.5M/WC

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Delafuente/18&over/4.5M62291128301
2GEPTA/Uraga/18&over/4.5M/WC62261430306
3GEPTA-4.5-Adult/M(Vida)(EPTC#3)0853572460

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Abraham Gandarilla
usually #1 Doubles 32%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4.5
4.08
Chris Missirian
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
4.08
Chuck Duarte
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 4.5
Erick Torres
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Fermin Escalante
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Gustavo Ganem
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Joaquin Berdeja
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Jonathon James
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Jose Terrazas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Juan Uraga
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mateo Cisneros
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nicholas Spurbeck
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Peter Jilkov
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Ramon Gomez
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Ricardo James
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ramon Gomez + Joaquin Berdeja8356% games+6.2% vs expected
Ricardo James + Jonathon James6156% gamesnot enough data
Juan Uraga + Fermin Escalante3350% gamesnot enough data
Erick Torres + Chuck Duarte5064% gamesnot enough data
Chris Missirian + Joaquin Berdeja134 matchesnot enough data
Erick Torres + Gustavo Ganem213 matchesnot enough data
Ramon Gomez + Chuck Duarte123 matchesnot enough data
Ramon Gomez + Chris Missirian123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abraham Gandarilla
71W–41L career · 26 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Chris Missirian
46W–65L career · 14 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Chuck Duarte
79W–43L career · 29 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
Erick Torres
43W–11L career · 22 lines in 2024
not enough data
Fermin Escalante
47W–32L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gustavo Ganem
16W–15L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joaquin Berdeja
23W–30L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jonathon James
6W–1L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jose Terrazas
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Juan Uraga
89W–29L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mateo Cisneros
43W–14L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicholas Spurbeck
23W–3L career · 20 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Jilkov
12W–13L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ramon Gomez
69W–33L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ricardo James
9W–8L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.