Teams

GEPTA/Delafuente/18&over/4.5M

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Delafuente/18&over/4.5M62291128301
2GEPTA/Uraga/18&over/4.5M/WC62261430306
3GEPTA-4.5-Adult/M(Vida)(EPTC#3)0853572460

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Alex Anoveros
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published 4.5
Brian McCormick
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
Creighton Jones
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published 4.5
4.09
Carlos Fraire
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4.5
Don Davie
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
ISAAC GABRIEL ROYVAL-LARA
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Ismael Arellano Flores
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Jacob Maese
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Jaime Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
John Schatzman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Jose Estrada
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Jose Maese
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rene Archuleta
usually #2 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Tony Magana
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Ulrich Delafuente
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacob Maese + Jose Maese9453% games+9.3% vs expected
Creighton Jones + Ulrich Delafuente17261% games+1.0% vs expected
Alex Anoveros + Tony Magana314 matchesnot enough data
Carlos Fraire + Tony Magana044 matchesnot enough data
Jose Estrada + Tony Magana213 matchesnot enough data
Alex Anoveros + Carlos Fraire123 matchesnot enough data
John Schatzman + Brian McCormick213 matchesnot enough data
Rene Archuleta + Ulrich Delafuente303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alex Anoveros
42W–43L career · 18 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Brian McCormick
41W–18L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Creighton Jones
29W–7L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Carlos Fraire
39W–58L career · 7 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.09
Don Davie
23W–32L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
ISAAC GABRIEL ROYVAL-LARA
5W–6L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ismael Arellano Flores
21W–12L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jacob Maese
48W–40L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jaime Herrera
22W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Schatzman
43W–40L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jose Estrada
27W–18L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jose Maese
46W–64L career · 16 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rene Archuleta
54W–23L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tony Magana
87W–41L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ulrich Delafuente
61W–25L career · 21 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.