Teams

Liaw/LR/Reb

2022 Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
JoeAnn Ashby
published
3.33
Ann Perry
published 3.5
3.29
Jessica Donahue
published
3.26
Margaret Hoskyn
published
3.25
Susan Gammill
published
3.23
Lisa Breeding
published
3.23
Sarah Hugen
published
3.21
Melissa Riddle
published
3.17
Joy Liaw
published
3.12
Kelli Beavers
published
3.07
Anita Mason
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Breeding + Jessica Donahue15958% games+5.8% vs expected
Margaret Hoskyn + JoeAnn Ashby3263% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Hoskyn + Ann Perry4157% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Breeding + Susan Gammill123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

JoeAnn Ashby
22W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Ann Perry
43W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Jessica Donahue
27W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Margaret Hoskyn
41W–31L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Susan Gammill
34W–45L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Lisa Breeding
40W–29L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Sarah Hugen
27W–23L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Melissa Riddle
25W–33L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Joy Liaw
23W–13L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Kelli Beavers
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Anita Mason
56W–27L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.