Teams

SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 55AW8.0A

2023 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-28vs HOPKINS PK 55AW8.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Tallett / Hsiao-Yun Yang vs Lori Cruz-Spray / Kaori Enomoto6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-20vs LADERA OAKS 55AW8.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesLona Means / Janet Tallett vs Diane Currie / Yvonne Selner6-7, 2-6
2023-05-07vs UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 55AW8.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Whelan / Janet Tallett vs Stephanie King / Teri Parekh6-1, 6-3
2023-05-02vs LADERA OAKS 55AW8.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Tallett / Wanda Soon vs Holly Williams / Joanne Lofthouse3-6, 3-6
2023-04-29vs PENINSULA TC 55AW8.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Tallett / Elaine Ikeda vs Linda Benvenuto / Kristen Willig7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Lona Means
published
3.80
Serene Lai
published
3.72
Janet Tallett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.72
Elaine Ikeda
published
3.65
Susan Gibson
published
3.64
Victoria Leong-Ping
published
3.63
Claire Sheehan
published 4
3.58
3.54
Laura Fanucchi
published
3.53
Tammy Mason
published
3.48
Wanda Soon
published
Gabrielle Whelan
published
Hsiao-Yun Yang
published
Julie Alford
published
Mila Paul
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Leong-Ping + Lona Means303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lona Means
16W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
Serene Lai
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
Janet Tallett
91W–65L career · 9 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.72
Elaine Ikeda
17W–25L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Susan Gibson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Victoria Leong-Ping
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Claire Sheehan
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Michelle Breman Olson
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Laura Fanucchi
26W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
Tammy Mason
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.53
Wanda Soon
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
Gabrielle Whelan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Hsiao-Yun Yang
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Alford
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mila Paul
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.