Teams

Fleming - Douse

2026 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring '26 · Men 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.94 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-05vs CSRATA/Gregory MahoneyLost 23
L#1 DoublesJoel Scraper / Damon Wright vs Jacob Kranenberg / Ross Lyons3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJames Xiao vs Nathan Morgan6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEraaj Patel / Darius Lawson vs Alex Ferrand / Austin Rich6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDave Besel vs Christopher Payne0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJonathan Baker / Christopher Douse vs David Farr / Benjamin Prijatel6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-19vs RVW - MoralesWon 32
W#1 DoublesRobert Manz / Eraaj Patel vs Jim Wheeler / Ken Wheeler6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJames Xiao vs Max Kennedy6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoel Scraper / Darius Lawson vs Jeffrey Wood / Scott Flenner6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesThomas Ruffin vs Iran Morales0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJames Wood / Santoine Lee vs Kevin Franklin / Henry Moon6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2026-02-12vs Woodside - ChafinLost 13
L#1 DoublesDamon Wright / Dave Besel vs Benjamin Proctor / Jeffrey Crenshaw2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJames Xiao vs Allan Hickman6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEraaj Patel / Thomas Ruffin vs Banks Mumford / David Hughes1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAshish Gohel / Jagdish Chawla vs Jeffrey Homan / Will Chafin1-6, 3-6
2026-02-10vs CSRATA/Gregory MahoneyLost 14
W#1 DoublesRobert Manz / Jonathan Baker vs Austin Rich / David Farr3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJames Xiao vs Nathan Morgan1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEraaj Patel / James Wood vs Jacob Kranenberg / Alex Ferrand6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDave Besel vs Christopher Payne1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJagdish Chawla / Santoine Lee vs William Je / Gregory Mahoney2-6, 1-6
2026-01-29vs RVW - MoralesWon 32
W#1 DoublesDamon Wright / Santoine Lee vs MacKenize Morris / Henry Moon6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesThomas Ruffin vs Ethan Rodrigues0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Douse / Darius Lawson vs Iran Morales / Max Kennedy6-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJames Xiao vs Jeffrey Wood6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJames Wood / Eraaj Patel vs Kevin Franklin / Matthew McFatridge6-3, 7-6
2026-01-22vs Woodside - ChafinWon 41
L#1 DoublesJonathan Baker / Robert Manz vs Jeffrey Homan / Patrick Daly5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDave Besel vs Benjamin Proctor6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDamon Wright / Joel Scraper vs Banks Mumford / Joshua Beler6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesJames Xiao vs Jeffrey Crenshaw6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAshish Gohel / Eraaj Patel vs Steve Watson / George Larsen6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
James Xiao
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
3.05
Jonathan Baker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Eraaj Patel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
James Wood
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Darius Lawson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Santoine Lee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Dave Besel
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.65
Joel Scraper
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Christopher Douse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Ashish Gohel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.56
Robert Manz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Jagdish Chawla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.28
Thomas Ruffin
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Manz + Jonathan Baker7748% games−9.3% vs expected
Jagdish Chawla + Santoine Lee213 matchesnot enough data
Jagdish Chawla + Ashish Gohel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
James Xiao
15W–2L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.27
Jonathan Baker
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Eraaj Patel
4W–2L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
James Wood
18W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Darius Lawson
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Santoine Lee
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Dave Besel
19W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
Joel Scraper
13W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
2.65
3
Christopher Douse
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
2.5
Ashish Gohel
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%20%80%
2.61
Robert Manz
16W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Jagdish Chawla
4W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Thomas Ruffin
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.